dc.contributor.author |
Blacksell, S.D. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Tanganuchitcharnchai, A. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Jarman, R.G. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Gibbons, R.V. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Paris, D.H. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Bailey, M.S. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Day, N.P. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Premaratna, R. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
Lalloo, D.G. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.author |
de Silva, H.J. |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-10-29T09:32:15Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-10-29T09:32:15Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Clinical and Vaccine Immunology; 18(10): pp.1773-75 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1556-6811 (Print) |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1556-679X (Electronic) |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2035 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
A Sri Lankan fever cohort (n = 292 patients; 17.8% prevalence) was used to assess two standard diagnostic Chikungunya IgM tests. The immunochromatographic test (ICT) acute sample sensitivity (SN) was 1.9 to 3.9%, and specificity (SP) was 92.5 to 95.0%. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) gave an acute sample SN of 3.9% and an SP of 92.5% and a convalescent sample SN of 84% and an SP of 91%. These assays are not suitable for the acute diagnosis of Chikungunya virus infection. |
|
dc.publisher |
American Society for Microbiology |
en_US |
dc.title |
Poor diagnostic accuracy of commercial antibody-based assays for the diagnosis of acute Chikungunya infection |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.creator.corporateauthor |
American Society for Microbiology |
en_US |