Digital Repository

Comparison of cryptogenic and hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Siriwardana, R.C. en_US
dc.contributor.author Niriella, M.A. en_US
dc.contributor.author Dassanayake, A.S. en_US
dc.contributor.author de Silva, A.P. en_US
dc.contributor.author Gunetilleke, B. en_US
dc.contributor.author Chok, K.S.H. en_US
dc.contributor.author Lo, C.M. en_US
dc.contributor.author Chan, S.C. en_US
dc.contributor.author Fan, S.T. en_US
dc.contributor.author de Silva, S.T. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2017-10-16T08:27:23Z
dc.date.available 2017-10-16T08:27:23Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Sri Lanka Medical Association, 129th Anniversary International Medical Congress. 2016: 206 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0009-0895
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/17834
dc.description Poster Presentation Abstract (PP 96), 129th Anniversary International Medical Congress, Sri Lanka Medical Association, 25-27 July 2016 Colombo, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.description.abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Viral hepatitis is the leading cause for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) globally. Cryptogenic or non-alcoholic fatty liver related HCC is increasing and is predominant in Sri Lanka (SL). Few studies have compared cryptogenic (cHCC) and hepatitis B (bHCC) HCC. Objective of the study was to compare cryptogenic and hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma. METHOD: Patients with HCC were screened at two centres, in Hong Kong (HK) and SL, from 2012-2014. HCC was diagnosed on typical CT/MRI appearance. Biopsy was performed when uncertain. Those with safe alcohol intake, no hepatotoxic exposure, and not having viral, autoimmune or inherited aetiology were considered cHCC. Demography, baseline liver status, tumour characteristics and treatment were compared between groups. A p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 891 patients (350-SL,541-HK). All HK patients were HBsAg positive. Two HBsAg positive SL patients, and 363 with unsafe alcohol intake were excluded. There were no hepatitis C patients. cHCC=234 and bHCC=292 were compared. There was no difference in gender, presenting age, symptoms, transaminases, platelet counts, median tumour diameter, morphology and tumour stage at presentation between groups. Significantly more cHCC had diabetes [133 vs. 67], while more bHCC were cirrhotics [269 vs.175]. At presentation, serum bilirubin was significantly higher in bHCC (1.2 vs. 0.7), while INR (1.23vs1.1) and AFP (51u/lvs.26u/l) were significantly higher in cHCC. bHCC had significantly more surgical candidates [113 vs. 50], while significantly more cHCC were transarterial- chemo-embolization (TACE) candidates [74 vs. 53]. More cHCC were unsuitable for active treatment despite similar tumour stage at presentation. CONCLUSIONS: More cHCC had diabetes and occurred in non-cirrhotic livers. Compared to bHCC, fewer cHCC were candidates for surgery or active treatment at presentation. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Sri Lanka Medical Association en_US
dc.subject Carcinoma, Hepatocellular en_US
dc.subject Carcinoma, Hepatocellular-etiology en_US
dc.subject Hepatitis B en_US
dc.title Comparison of cryptogenic and hepatitis B related hepatocellular carcinoma en_US
dc.type Conference Abstract en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference Papers
    Papers presented at local and international conferences by the Staff of the Faculty of Medicine

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account