Digital Repository

Effect of mebendazole therapy in pregnancy on birth outcome

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author de Silva, N.R. en_US
dc.contributor.author Sirisena, J. en_US
dc.contributor.author Gunasekera, D.P.S. en_US
dc.contributor.author Ismail, M.M. en_US
dc.contributor.author de Silva, H.J. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-29T09:18:24Z
dc.date.available 2014-10-29T09:18:24Z
dc.date.issued 1999 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Lancet. 1999; 353(9159): pp.1145-1149 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0140-6736 (Print) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1474-547X (Electronic) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1406
dc.description Indexed in MEDLINE
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: In areas endemic for hookworm, routine antenatal mebendazole therapy could greatly reduce the prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy. At present, however, this is not a widely accepted control strategy because of a lack of data on the safety of the drug. We assessed the effect of mebendazole therapy during pregnancy on birth outcome. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was done in Sri Lanka, where prescription of mebendazole to women in the second trimester of pregnancy is recommended. Two hospitals were chosen for the study, and women who gave birth there between May, 1996, and March, 1997, were recruited. We compared the rates of major congenital defects, stillbirth, perinatal death, and low birthweight (less or equal 1500 g) among babies of mothers who had taken mebendazole during pregnancy with those whose mothers had not taken an anthelmintic (controls). FINDINGS: The rate of major congenital defects was not significantly higher in the mebendazole group than in the control group (97 [1.8 percent] of 5275 vs 26 [1.5 percent] of 1737; odds ratio 1.24 [95 percent CI 0.8-1.91], p equal 0.39). Among 407 women who had taken mebendazole in the first trimester (contrary to medical advice), 10 (2.5 percent) had major congenital defects (odds ratio vs controls 1.66 [0.81-3.56], p equal 0.23). The proportions of stillbirths and perinatal deaths were significantly lower in the mebendazole group (1.9 vs 3.3 percent, 0.55 [95 percent CI 0.4-0.77]), as was the proportion of low-birthweight babies (1.1 vs 2.3 percent 0.47 [95 percent CI 0.32-0.71]). INTERPRETATION: Mebendazole therapy during pregnancy is not associated with a significant increase in major congenital defects, but our results indicate that it should be avoided during the first trimester. This therapy could offer beneficial effects to pregnant women in developing countries, where intestinal helminthiases are endemic. en_US
dc.publisher Lancet Publishing Group en_US
dc.subject Antinematodal Agents en_US
dc.subject Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic en_US
dc.subject Antinematodal Agents-adverse effects en_US
dc.subject Cross-Sectional Studies en_US
dc.subject Hookworm Infections-drug therapy en_US
dc.subject Mebendazole-adverse effects en_US
dc.subject Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic en_US
dc.subject Pregnancy Outcome en_US
dc.subject Antinematodal Agents en_US
dc.subject Mebendazole en_US
dc.subject Infant, Newborn en_US
dc.title Effect of mebendazole therapy in pregnancy on birth outcome en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.department Parasitology en_US
dc.identifier.department Medicine en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account