Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/20483
Title: Fixed-combination, low-dose, triple-pill antihypertensive medication versus usual care in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in Sri Lanka: a within-trial and modelled economic evaluation of the TRIUMPH trial.
Authors: Lung, T.
Jan, S.
de Silva, H.A.
Guggilla, R.
Maulik, P.K.
Naik, N.
Patel, A.
de Silva, A.P.
Rajapakse, S.
Ranasinghe, G.
Prabhakaran, D.
Rodgers, A.
Salam, A.
Selak, V.
Stepien, S.
Thom, S.
Webster, R.
Lea-Laba, T.
TRIUMPH Study Group.
Keywords: Hypertension
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: The Lancet. Global health.
Citation: The Lancet. Global Health. 2019 ; 7(10):e1359-e1366
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Elevated blood pressure incurs a major health and economic burden, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. The Triple Pill versus Usual Care Management for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension (TRIUMPH) trial showed a greater reduction in blood pressure in patients using fixed-combination, low-dose, triple-pill antihypertensive therapy (consisting of amlodipine, telmisartan, and chlorthalidone) than in those receiving usual care in Sri Lanka. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the triple-pill strategy. METHODS: We did a within-trial (6-month) and modelled (10-year) economic evaluation of the TRIUMPH trial, using the health system perspective. Health-care costs, reported in 2017 US dollars, were determined from trial records and published literature. A discrete-time simulation model was developed, extrapolating trial findings of reduced systolic blood pressure to 10-year health-care costs, cardiovascular disease events, and mortality. The primary outcomes were the proportion of people reaching blood pressure targets (at 6 months from baseline) and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted (at 10 years from baseline). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated to estimate the cost per additional participant achieving target blood pressure at 6 months and cost per DALY averted over 10 years. FINDINGS: The triple-pill strategy, compared with usual care, cost an additional US$9·63 (95% CI 5·29 to 13·97) per person in the within-trial analysis and $347·75 (285·55 to 412·54) per person in the modelled analysis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated at $7·93 (95% CI 6·59 to 11·84) per participant reaching blood pressure targets at 6 months and $2842·79 (-28·67 to 5714·24) per DALY averted over a 10-year period. INTERPRETATION: Compared with usual care, the triple-pill strategy is cost-effective for patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Scaled up investment in the triple pill for hypertension management in Sri Lanka should be supported to address the high population burden of cardiovascular disease.
Description: Indexed for MEDLINE.
URI: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/20483
ISSN: 2214-109X (Electronic)
2214-109X (Linking)
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hypertention..pdf452.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.