Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/20483
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLung, T.
dc.contributor.authorJan, S.
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, H.A.
dc.contributor.authorGuggilla, R.
dc.contributor.authorMaulik, P.K.
dc.contributor.authorNaik, N.
dc.contributor.authorPatel, A.
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorRajapakse, S.
dc.contributor.authorRanasinghe, G.
dc.contributor.authorPrabhakaran, D.
dc.contributor.authorRodgers, A.
dc.contributor.authorSalam, A.
dc.contributor.authorSelak, V.
dc.contributor.authorStepien, S.
dc.contributor.authorThom, S.
dc.contributor.authorWebster, R.
dc.contributor.authorLea-Laba, T.
dc.contributor.authorTRIUMPH Study Group.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-15T06:47:30Z
dc.date.available2019-11-15T06:47:30Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationThe Lancet. Global Health. 2019 ; 7(10):e1359-e1366en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214-109X (Electronic)
dc.identifier.issn2214-109X (Linking)
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/20483
dc.descriptionIndexed for MEDLINE.en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Elevated blood pressure incurs a major health and economic burden, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. The Triple Pill versus Usual Care Management for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension (TRIUMPH) trial showed a greater reduction in blood pressure in patients using fixed-combination, low-dose, triple-pill antihypertensive therapy (consisting of amlodipine, telmisartan, and chlorthalidone) than in those receiving usual care in Sri Lanka. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the triple-pill strategy. METHODS: We did a within-trial (6-month) and modelled (10-year) economic evaluation of the TRIUMPH trial, using the health system perspective. Health-care costs, reported in 2017 US dollars, were determined from trial records and published literature. A discrete-time simulation model was developed, extrapolating trial findings of reduced systolic blood pressure to 10-year health-care costs, cardiovascular disease events, and mortality. The primary outcomes were the proportion of people reaching blood pressure targets (at 6 months from baseline) and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted (at 10 years from baseline). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated to estimate the cost per additional participant achieving target blood pressure at 6 months and cost per DALY averted over 10 years. FINDINGS: The triple-pill strategy, compared with usual care, cost an additional US$9·63 (95% CI 5·29 to 13·97) per person in the within-trial analysis and $347·75 (285·55 to 412·54) per person in the modelled analysis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated at $7·93 (95% CI 6·59 to 11·84) per participant reaching blood pressure targets at 6 months and $2842·79 (-28·67 to 5714·24) per DALY averted over a 10-year period. INTERPRETATION: Compared with usual care, the triple-pill strategy is cost-effective for patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Scaled up investment in the triple pill for hypertension management in Sri Lanka should be supported to address the high population burden of cardiovascular disease.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Lancet. Global health.en_US
dc.subjectHypertensionen_US
dc.titleFixed-combination, low-dose, triple-pill antihypertensive medication versus usual care in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in Sri Lanka: a within-trial and modelled economic evaluation of the TRIUMPH trial.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hypertention..pdf452.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.