Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1386
Title: Prospective clinical and functional audit of emergency and elective haemorrhoidectomy
Authors: Deen, K.I.
Paris, M.A.S.
Ariyaratne, M.H.J.
Samarasekera, D.N.
Keywords: Digestive System Surgical Procedures
Hemorrhoidectomy
Postoperative Complications
Medical Audit
Issue Date: 1999
Publisher: College of Surgeons of Sri Lanka
Citation: The Sri Lanka Journal of Surgery. 1999; 17(1): pp.10-13
Abstract: Background Traditionally, prolapsed thrombosed haemorrhoids have been treated conservatively because of the popular belief that the incidence of complications are greater after emergency operation compared with elective operation for haemorrhoids. An audit comparing emergency operation for prolapsed thrombosed haemorrhoids with elective operation for third and fourth degree haemorrhoids is presented. Patients and methods 104 patients (82 male, median age 47 years, range -18 to 80 years) undergoing emer- gency (65) or elective haemorrhoidectomy (39) were evaluated for complications after operation, hospital stay and postoperative bowel function which was assessed at 3 months by mailed questionnaire. Results Trainees performed as many operations as consultants (trainee 48 (46 percent) vs. consultant 56 (54 percent) although consultants performed more emergency operations (trainee-20, consultant-45). Postoperative complications were seen in 13 (12percent) ; emergency-9 versus elective-4 (p=0.69). There was no difference in complications after trainee performed operation (8) compared with operation by consultant (5). Median (range) duration of hospital stay after emergency operation was 2 days (1-17) compared with elective operation -2 days (1-10). A subset of 41 patients responded to a questionnaire on bowel function at 3 months: 5 of twenty five (20 percent) after emergency haemorrhoidectomy and 2 of sixteen (12.5 percent) after elective haemorrhoidectomy reported transient incontinence to gas or stool up to 3 weeks after operations but none were incontinent at 3 months. After emergency haemorrhoidectomy, 9 (36 percent) reported a sense of anal narrowing compared with 2 (12.5 percent) after elective haemorrhoidectomy (p=0.13). None required corrective surgery for anal stenosis. Conclusion There were no significant differences in complications, hospital stay and postoperative bowel function in patients after emergency and elective haemorrhoidectomy. Emergency haemorrhoidectomy is likely to result in low morbidity when undertaken by trained persons.
URI: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1386
ISSN: 1391-491X (Print)
2279-2201(Online)
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.