Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1386
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeen, K.I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorParis, M.A.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAriyaratne, M.H.J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSamarasekera, D.N.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T09:16:15Z
dc.date.available2014-10-29T09:16:15Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Sri Lanka Journal of Surgery. 1999; 17(1): pp.10-13en_US
dc.identifier.issn1391-491X (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2279-2201(Online)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1386
dc.description.abstractBackground Traditionally, prolapsed thrombosed haemorrhoids have been treated conservatively because of the popular belief that the incidence of complications are greater after emergency operation compared with elective operation for haemorrhoids. An audit comparing emergency operation for prolapsed thrombosed haemorrhoids with elective operation for third and fourth degree haemorrhoids is presented. Patients and methods 104 patients (82 male, median age 47 years, range -18 to 80 years) undergoing emer- gency (65) or elective haemorrhoidectomy (39) were evaluated for complications after operation, hospital stay and postoperative bowel function which was assessed at 3 months by mailed questionnaire. Results Trainees performed as many operations as consultants (trainee 48 (46 percent) vs. consultant 56 (54 percent) although consultants performed more emergency operations (trainee-20, consultant-45). Postoperative complications were seen in 13 (12percent) ; emergency-9 versus elective-4 (p=0.69). There was no difference in complications after trainee performed operation (8) compared with operation by consultant (5). Median (range) duration of hospital stay after emergency operation was 2 days (1-17) compared with elective operation -2 days (1-10). A subset of 41 patients responded to a questionnaire on bowel function at 3 months: 5 of twenty five (20 percent) after emergency haemorrhoidectomy and 2 of sixteen (12.5 percent) after elective haemorrhoidectomy reported transient incontinence to gas or stool up to 3 weeks after operations but none were incontinent at 3 months. After emergency haemorrhoidectomy, 9 (36 percent) reported a sense of anal narrowing compared with 2 (12.5 percent) after elective haemorrhoidectomy (p=0.13). None required corrective surgery for anal stenosis. Conclusion There were no significant differences in complications, hospital stay and postoperative bowel function in patients after emergency and elective haemorrhoidectomy. Emergency haemorrhoidectomy is likely to result in low morbidity when undertaken by trained persons.en_US
dc.publisherCollege of Surgeons of Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectDigestive System Surgical Proceduresen_US
dc.subjectHemorrhoidectomyen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Complicationsen_US
dc.subjectMedical Auditen_US
dc.titleProspective clinical and functional audit of emergency and elective haemorrhoidectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.departmentSurgeryen_US
dc.creator.corporateauthorCollege of Surgeons of Sri Lankaen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.