Digital Repository

Factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with World Health Organization group II anovulation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Palihawadana, T.S.
dc.contributor.author Wijesinghe, P.S.
dc.contributor.author Seneviratne, H.R.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-08-25T05:15:24Z
dc.date.available 2015-08-25T05:15:24Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences.2015;8(2):75-9 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0974-1208 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn 1998-4766 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9284
dc.description Indexed in Scopus; In PUBMED; Not Indexed in MEDLINE en_US
dc.description.abstract CONTEXT: Letrozole, a third generation aromatase inhibitor is gaining importance in ovulation induction. Some prefer to use it as a second line agent in women who fail to respond to clomifene citrate. However, our knowledge about the predictors of response to letrozole is limited. AIMS: The study was aimed at identifying the factors associated with letrozole resistance among women with World Health Organization (WHO) group II anovulation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Study was conducted at the infertility clinic at a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. A case–control study design was used and included 50 subjects with WHO group II anovulation (25 clomifene responsive and 25 clomifene resistant). After a treatment cycle of letrozole, the factors were compared between the subjects who responded and those who failed to respond to treatment. RESULTS: Ovulation was achieved in 76% (n = 19) of subjects who had responded to clomifene previously and in 24% (n = 6) with clomifene resistance. The factors associated with letrozole resistance included the presence of hirsutism (odds ratio [OR]: 3.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2–12.3) and clomifene resistance (OR: 10.03; 95% CI: 2.81–35.7). The early follicular phase mean (standard deviation) luteinizing hormone level was significantly higher among the nonresponders (9.75 [4.78] – 7.28 [2.3]; P = 0.02). Nonresponders showed significantly lower levels of oestradiol on the 5th and 9th days (28.50 [3.39] pg/mL vs. 7.49 [3.62] pg/mL; P = 0.0007 and 142.04 [76.22] pg/mL vs. 28.10 [12.8] pg/mL; P = 0.0001) of the menstrual cycle, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The features associated with resistance to Letrozole at a dose of 2.5 mg show some overlap with those associated with clomifene resistance. However, some features do not show similar association. The effectiveness of letrozole at a dose of 2.5 mg in induction of ovulation among women with clomifene resistance is low and it does not seem to be a suitable treatment at a dose of 2.5 mg for this indication. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Medknow Publications en_US
dc.subject Ovulation induction en_US
dc.title Factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with World Health Organization group II anovulation en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account