Bisphenol-S exposure of zebrafish unveils the hidden risks of bisphenol paradigm with growth, developmental, and behavioral impacts similar to bisphenol-A

Abstract

The introduction of bisphenol-S (BPS) in substitution of bisphenol-A (BPA) has become argumentative owing to their endocrine destructive properties and insufficient comparative ecotoxicity assessments. Thus, comparative effects of long-term, low-dose BPA and BPS exposure on the development of juvenile zebrafish (Danio rerio) were investigated. Juvenile zebrafish (age: 21 days; weight: ~ 61.5 mg; length: ~ 7.56 mm) were exposed to environmentally-relevant 50 µg/L of BPA, BPS, and control for ~ 60 days in triplicate. Both BPA and BPS significantly increased length (p = 0.00), weight (p = 0.00), specific growth rate (p = 0.00), female preponderance (p = 0.003), mortality (p = 0.017), ammonia excretion (p = 0.00), and aggression (p = 0.00) in zebrafish compared to control. Both bisphenols significantly reduced fish swimming speed in a comparable manner (p = 0.001). A notably higher female-biased-sex ratio was observed in BPS than in BPA (p = 0.003). The length gain (p = 0.014) and aggression (p = 0.032) were higher in BPA-treated fish than in BPS. However, a significant difference was not shown in body mass index (p = 0.295) and condition factor (p = 0.256) between bisphenols and control (p < 0.05). BPA and BPS exposure led to hyperplasia, mucous secretion, aneurism in fish gills, vacuolization and necrosis in liver. Therefore, BPS (~ 50 µg/L) also imposes noteworthy threats to aquatic wildlife, emphasizing the necessity of toxicity assessments and regular monitoring aiming at bespoken environmental standards for freshwater.

Description

Keywords

Danio rerio, Sex ratio, Ammonia excretion, Aggression, Swimming speed, Histopathology

Citation

Shanika, D., & Rajapaksa, G. (2025). Bisphenol-S exposure of zebrafish unveils the hidden risks of bisphenol paradigm with growth, developmental, and behavioral impacts similar to bisphenol-A. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91984-z

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By