Digital Repository

Local infiltration versus Laparoscopic e guided transverse abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy e double blinded randomized control trial

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Siriwardana, R.C.
dc.contributor.author Kumarage, S.K.
dc.contributor.author Gunetilleke, M.B.
dc.contributor.author Thilakarathne, S.B.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-14T11:54:51Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-14T11:54:51Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation HPB. 2018; 20 (S2):S720 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1365-182X
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/24342
dc.description E Poster Abstract(EP03C-026), 13th World Congress of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, 4-7 September 2018, Geneva, Switzerland en_US
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Transverse abdominal plane block (TAP) is a new technique of regional block described to reduce postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Recent reports describe an easy technique to deliver local anesthetic agent under laparoscopic guidance. METHODS: This randomized control trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of additional laparoscopic guided TAP block against the standard full thickness port site infiltration. 45 patients were randomized in to each arm after excluding emergency LC, conversions, ones with coagulopathy, pregnancy and allergy to local anesthetics. All cases were four ports LC. Interventions - Both groups received standard port site infiltration with 3-5ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The test group received additional laparoscopic guided TAP block with 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine subcostaly, between the anterior axillary and mid clavicular lines. As outcome measures the pain score, opioid requirement, episodes of nausea and vomiting and time to mobilize was measured at 6 hourly intervals. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in the age, gender, body mass index, indication for cholecystectomy difficulty index and surgery duration. The pain score at six hours (P = 0.043) and opioid requirement at six hours (P =0.026) was higher in the TAP group. These were similar in subsequent assessments. Other secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-guided transverses abdominis plane block does not give an additional pain relief or other favorable outcomes. It can worsen the pain scores en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.subject Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic en_US
dc.subject Pain, Postoperative -prevention & control en_US
dc.title Local infiltration versus Laparoscopic e guided transverse abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy e double blinded randomized control trial en_US
dc.type Conference Abstract en_US
dc.creator.corporateauthor International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association(IHPBA) en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference Papers
    Papers presented at local and international conferences by the Staff of the Faculty of Medicine

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account