Digital Repository

Accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight formulae to predict actual birthweight after 34 weeks: prospective validation study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kumarasiri, S. en_US
dc.contributor.author Wanigasekara, R. en_US
dc.contributor.author Wahalawatta, L. en_US
dc.contributor.author Jayasinghe, L. en_US
dc.contributor.author Padeniya, T. en_US
dc.contributor.author Dias, T. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-29T09:43:08Z en_US
dc.date.available 2014-10-29T09:43:08Z en_US
dc.date.issued 2013 en_US
dc.identifier.citation The Ceylon Medical Journal. 2013; 58(3): 116-21 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0009-0875 (Print) en_US
dc.identifier.other 10.4038/cmj.v58i3.6104. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2322 en_US
dc.description Indexed in MEDLINE en_US
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVES: Late onset fetal growth restriction is often missed and is responsible for most intrauterine deaths. Ultrasound fetal biometry is routinely used to calculate estimated fetal weight (EFW). The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of established ultrasound EFW formulae to identify small and large for gestational age fetuses when used after 35 weeks gestation. METHODS: This was a prospective validation study done between January 2012 and July 2012 at General Hospital Ampara. An ultrasound examination was performed and fetal biometry was documented within one week before the delivery in well dated pregnancies. The mean of the differences between ultrasound EFW derived from 9 formulae and true birthweight and their standard error of mean (SE) were calculated for each formula. Systematic measurement error was assumed to exist if zero lay outside the mean difference ± 2SE. To show the EFW frequency distribution, z-scores were calculated as the number of standard deviations an observed EFW measurement deviated from the mean for gestation. RESULTS: A total of 393 pregnancies at gestational age between 35 and 41 weeks were recruited. Mean gestational age at the ultra sound scan was 39.36 weeks SD (1.05). All EFW formulae either under or over estimated the birthweight in singleton pregnancies. Almost all the formulae over estimated the fetal weight in low birthweight babies whilst underestimating the fetal weight in birthweight >3500g. Campbell formula remained the only EFW formula without systematic error when measuring babies between 2500g and 3500g. None of the EFW z-scores were normally distributed. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that all routinely used EFW formulae would either over or under estimate the fetal weight. Until an optimum EFW formula that suits the Sri Lankan population is determined, interpretation of ultrasound EFW should be done cautiously, especially in small for gestational age babies en_US
dc.publisher Sri Lanka Medical Association en_US
dc.source.uri http://cmj.sljol.info/articles/abstract/10.4038/cmj.v58i3.6104/ en
dc.subject Fetal Weight en_US
dc.title Accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight formulae to predict actual birthweight after 34 weeks: prospective validation study en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.department Obstetrics and Gynaecology en_US
dc.creator.corporateauthor Sri Lanka Medical Association en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account