Digital Repository

Nonpuerperal uterine inversion: What the gynaecologists need to know?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Herath, R.P.
dc.contributor.author Patabendige, M.
dc.contributor.author Rashid, M.
dc.contributor.author Wijesinghe, P.S.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-08-04T04:41:15Z
dc.date.available 2020-08-04T04:41:15Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2020;2020:8625186. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1687-9589 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn 1687-9597 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.issn 1687-9597 (Linking)
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/21202
dc.description In Socpus; Not indexed in MEDLINE en_US
dc.description.abstract INTRODUCTION: Nonpuerperal uterine inversion (NPUI) is a rare clinical problem with diagnostic and surgical challenges. The objective of our study was to review the literature on NPUI and describe causative pathologies, diagnosis, and different surgical options available for treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was carried out on MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases to look for NPUI using the term "non-puerperal uterine inversion," and further went through the cross-references of the published articles. Data are published case reports from 1911 to September 2018. Of the 153 published cases, 133 reports had adequate details of surgery for analysis. These reports were analyzed, concerning the clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis, and surgical treatment. RESULTS: Mean age of the women was 46.3 years (standard deviation: 18, N = 153). Leiomyoma remained the commonest (56.2%) aetiology. While malignancies contributed to 32.02% of cases, 9.2% were idiopathic. High degree of clinical suspicion and identification of unique features on ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging enable prompt diagnosis. In cases of uncertainty, laparoscopy or biopsy of the mass was used to confirm the diagnosis. Hysterectomy or repositioning and repair of the uterus are the only treatment options available. The surgical methods implemented were analyzed in three aspects: route of surgical access, method of repositioning, and final surgical procedure undertaken. The majority (48.8%) had only abdominal access, while 27.1% had both abdominal and vaginal access. Haultain procedure was the most useful procedure for reposition (18.0%) of the uterus. The majority (39.7%) required abdominal hysterectomy with or without debulking of the tumour abdominally, while 15.0% had uterine repair after repositioning. We reviewed the different surgical techniques and described and proposed a treatment algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Fibroids were the commonest cause for NPUI. Malignancies accounted for one-third of cases. A combined abdominal and vaginal approach, followed by hysterectomy or repair after repositioning, seems to be better for nonmalignant cases. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Hindawi Pub. Corp. en_US
dc.subject Uterine Inversion en_US
dc.subject Uterine Inversion-diagnosis en
dc.subject Uterine Inversion-surgery
dc.subject Review
dc.title Nonpuerperal uterine inversion: What the gynaecologists need to know? en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account