Digital Repository

Computed tomography-based evaluation of segmental variation of liver density and Its implications.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Siriwardana, R.C. en
dc.contributor.author Sivasundaram, T.
dc.contributor.author Paranaheva, L.
dc.contributor.author Ediriweera, D.S.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-01T09:14:09Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-01T09:14:09Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2020;39(1):60-65.[Epub ahead of print]. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0254-8860 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn 0975-0711 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.issn 0254-8860 (Linking)
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/21104
dc.description Indexed in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Emerging Sources of Citation Index en_US
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become a major health concern. Focal fat deposition frequently seems to involve segment IV b. This indicates a consistent pattern of fat deposition in the liver. The present study evaluates the pattern of fat distribution in the liver using computed tomogram (CT) attenuation index. METHODS: Two radiologists evaluated 517 non-contrast CT scan images of the abdomen and pelvis. Two 40-mm2 regions of interest (ROIs) were selected from each segment. The hepatic segmental densities (HSDs) were obtained by calculating the mean densities of areas of corresponding liver segments. The mean hepatic attenuation (MHA) was quantified by obtaining the mean segmental densities. Densities were compared between the segments and with the MHA. RESULTS: The mean age (SD) of the patients was 55.5 year (15.6), and 276 (53.4%) were males. The overall mean hepatic density was 53.05 (95% CI, 52.95-53.15) Hounsfield units (HU). The lowest mean HSD was observed in segment IV b and the highest mean HSD was observed in segment V. Segments I, IV a and IV b showed significantly lower mean HSDs and segments V, VI and VIII showed significantly higher mean HSDs compared with the overall mean MHA/mean hepatic density (MHD), whereas mean HSDs of segments II, III and VII were not significantly different from the overall mean MHA/MHD. CONCLUSIONS: Segment IV b seems to be the most vulnerable site for fat deposition; focal lesions here should be carefully evaluated. Segments II, III and VII seem to closely represent MHD. KEYWORDS: Cirrhosis; Diagnostic imaging; Fatty liver; Non-alcholic fatty liver disease. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Indian Society of Gastroenterology en_US
dc.subject Tomography en_US
dc.title Computed tomography-based evaluation of segmental variation of liver density and Its implications. en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account