Digital Repository

First-trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dias, T. en_US
dc.contributor.author Mahsud-Dornan, S. en_US
dc.contributor.author Thilaganathan, B. en_US
dc.contributor.author Papageorghiou, A. T. en_US
dc.contributor.author Bhide, A. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-29T09:28:34Z
dc.date.available 2014-10-29T09:28:34Z
dc.date.issued 2010 en_US
dc.identifier.citation British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010; 117(8): pp.979-84 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1470-0328 (Print) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1471-0528 (Electronic) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1982
dc.description Indexed in MEDLINE
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of validated singleton crown-rump length (CRL) formulae in dating twin pregnancies at 11-14 weeks of gestation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Fetal medicine unit of a London teaching hospital. SAMPLE: Three hundred and eighty-four pregnancies with known dates of conception. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 266 singletons and 118 twin pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilisation (IVF), with a known date of conception. The gestation calculated from the date of conception was compared with the expected gestation from fetal size using a number of different CRL formulae. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference in gestational age computed from fetal size (CRL) of the bigger and smaller fetus in twin pregnancies and singleton pregnancies using three formulae. RESULTS: Two of the three studied CRL formulae systematically underestimated the mean gestational age and size of singleton IVF pregnancies (Robinson formula: gestation = 1.4 days, size = 2.7 mm). Twin CRL measurements straddled those of singletons, regardless of the CRL formula used (Robinson formula: larger twin gestation = 2.4 days, size = 4.7 mm; smaller twin gestation = 0.8 days, size = 1.7 mm). These underestimates in gestation and size for IVF singleton and twin pregnancies are well within the known limits of accuracy of first = trimester ultrasound measurements, and are of limited clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available CRL charts underestimate both the age and size of IVF singleton pregnancies by a clinically insignificant amount. This difference is similar for twin pregnancies, suggesting that singleton CRL charts can be used to date twin pregnancies accurately. en_US
dc.publisher Wiley en_US
dc.subject Pregnancy, Twin en_US
dc.title First-trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable? en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.department Obstetrics and Gynaecology en_US
dc.creator.corporateauthor Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (Great Britain) en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account