Digital Repository

Preparing future doctors for palliative care: views of course organisers

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Walker, S. en
dc.contributor.author Gibbins, J. en
dc.contributor.author Paes, P. en
dc.contributor.author Barclay, S. en_US
dc.contributor.author Adams, A. en
dc.contributor.author Chandratilake, M. en
dc.contributor.author Gishen, F. en
dc.contributor.author Lodge, P. en_US
dc.contributor.author Wee, B. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2017-05-12T07:23:48Z en
dc.date.available 2017-05-12T07:23:48Z en
dc.date.issued 2018 en_US
dc.identifier.citation BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 2018; 8(3):299-306 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2045-435X (Print)
dc.identifier.issn 2045-4368 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.issn 2045-435X (Linking)
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/17029
dc.description Indexed In MEDLINE en_US
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Effective training at medical school is essential to prepare new doctors to safely manage patients with palliative care (PC) and end of life care (EOLC) needs. The contribution of undergraduate PC course organisers is central but their collective views regarding role are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To survey attitudes of PC course organisers regarding their course, organisation, the adequacy of training provided and level of personal satisfaction. METHODS: An anonymised, multifactorial, web-based questionnaire was devised, tested, modified and then sent to lead PC course organisers at all UK medical schools. RESULTS: Data were obtained from all 30 UK medical schools. Organisers agreed/strongly agreed (=agreed) that their PC course was highly rated by students (26, 87%). 25 (83%) agreed their course 'enabled misconceptions and fears about PC, death, dying and bereavement to be addressed', 'delivered quality PC training' (23, 77%), 'fulfilled General Medical Council requirements' (19, 63%), 'prepared students well to care for patients with PC/EOLC needs' (18, 60%) and 'enabled students to visit a hospice and see the role of doctors in caring for the dying' (17, 57%). Concerns were limited capacity to accommodate students (agreed 20, 66%) and variability in teaching according to location (15, 50%). Most agreed their institution recognised PC training as important (22, 73%), they felt supported by colleagues (21, 70%) and experienced cooperation between stakeholders (20, 67%). All agreed that PC training was essential for undergraduates, while 29 (97%) supported inclusion of a hospice visit in the curriculum. 27 agreed that their role was satisfying (90%), 3 disagreed (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately two-thirds of organisers were generally positive about their PC course, institution and role. A minority expressed concerns; these may reflect suboptimal PC training at their medical school and poor preparation of new doctors. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher BMJ Publishing Group en_US
dc.subject palliative care en_US
dc.title Preparing future doctors for palliative care: views of course organisers en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account