Digital Repository

Intergenerational interaction in public transport

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Smol’kin, A.A.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-21T04:42:19Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-21T04:42:19Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Smol’kin, A.A. 2016. Intergenerational interaction in public transport. 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences (3rd ICSS), 30th September - 01st October 2016, Research Centre for Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. p 59. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/14673
dc.description.abstract This work is supposed to study the phenomenon “to (not) cede a seat” to elderly people in public transport (usually “to cede a seat” is understood as “manifestation of respect” by participants of a situation, and is estimated from daily prospect in this context). The research is based on interviews and materials of the participant observation of passengers behavior in public transport in 2009-2015 in Moscow and Saratov. Theoretical basis is Gofman's researches on Face-Work. Any person, who suddenly feels unhealthy and demonstrates it to others, will be likely to be given a seat unconditionally. Nevertheless, a 60 years old person looking strong and conscious, without any physical troubles (even if he or she might be retired) would be hardly invited to take a seat. The logic to concede a place is based not as much on the principle of the “respect for age(ing)”, but more on the “compassion for the ailing elderly”. Most part of conflict situations is based on different understanding of legitimate reasons for conceding a place – the vigorous behavior of an elderly person might not be compatible with a behavior scheme to which he or she intentionally refers. The conceding a place to the elderly person is a rule conditioned by the observer’s context. On one hand, “conceding a place” is still a socially expected norm, on the other, the rule is regularly broken. There are two main strategies “not to concede a place”: “I see but I can not” - a strategy of an “urgent business” when a person pretends being “occupied with something important”. This strategy can be divided into a short-term (“to play for time”) and a long-term (“to expose the impossibility”) options. “Inattention” strategy - I “do not see”, that theoretically does not allow to consider that the sitting person refuses to show respect as he or she is not “really included” in a situation. With regard to this strategy, we can mention: “looking out of the window”, “falling asleep”, “listening to music” and various options of manipulation with the cell phone. In practice most ways to avoid conceding a place combines both options in different proportions. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Research Centre for Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.subject elderly people en_US
dc.subject respect en_US
dc.subject behavior in public places en_US
dc.subject public transport en_US
dc.subject intergeneration relationship en_US
dc.subject rule of breaking rules en_US
dc.title Intergenerational interaction in public transport en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account