Digital Repository

Prospective clinical and functional audit of emergency and elective haemorrhoidectomy

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Deen, K.I. en_US
dc.contributor.author Paris, M.A.S. en_US
dc.contributor.author Ariyaratne, M.H.J. en_US
dc.contributor.author Samarasekera, D.N. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2014-10-29T09:16:15Z
dc.date.available 2014-10-29T09:16:15Z
dc.date.issued 1999 en_US
dc.identifier.citation The Sri Lanka Journal of Surgery. 1999; 17(1): pp.10-13 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1391-491X (Print) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2279-2201(Online) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/1386
dc.description.abstract Background Traditionally, prolapsed thrombosed haemorrhoids have been treated conservatively because of the popular belief that the incidence of complications are greater after emergency operation compared with elective operation for haemorrhoids. An audit comparing emergency operation for prolapsed thrombosed haemorrhoids with elective operation for third and fourth degree haemorrhoids is presented. Patients and methods 104 patients (82 male, median age 47 years, range -18 to 80 years) undergoing emer- gency (65) or elective haemorrhoidectomy (39) were evaluated for complications after operation, hospital stay and postoperative bowel function which was assessed at 3 months by mailed questionnaire. Results Trainees performed as many operations as consultants (trainee 48 (46 percent) vs. consultant 56 (54 percent) although consultants performed more emergency operations (trainee-20, consultant-45). Postoperative complications were seen in 13 (12percent) ; emergency-9 versus elective-4 (p=0.69). There was no difference in complications after trainee performed operation (8) compared with operation by consultant (5). Median (range) duration of hospital stay after emergency operation was 2 days (1-17) compared with elective operation -2 days (1-10). A subset of 41 patients responded to a questionnaire on bowel function at 3 months: 5 of twenty five (20 percent) after emergency haemorrhoidectomy and 2 of sixteen (12.5 percent) after elective haemorrhoidectomy reported transient incontinence to gas or stool up to 3 weeks after operations but none were incontinent at 3 months. After emergency haemorrhoidectomy, 9 (36 percent) reported a sense of anal narrowing compared with 2 (12.5 percent) after elective haemorrhoidectomy (p=0.13). None required corrective surgery for anal stenosis. Conclusion There were no significant differences in complications, hospital stay and postoperative bowel function in patients after emergency and elective haemorrhoidectomy. Emergency haemorrhoidectomy is likely to result in low morbidity when undertaken by trained persons. en_US
dc.publisher College of Surgeons of Sri Lanka en_US
dc.subject Digestive System Surgical Procedures en_US
dc.subject Hemorrhoidectomy en_US
dc.subject Postoperative Complications en_US
dc.subject Medical Audit en_US
dc.title Prospective clinical and functional audit of emergency and elective haemorrhoidectomy en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.identifier.department Surgery en_US
dc.creator.corporateauthor College of Surgeons of Sri Lanka en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account