Digital Repository

Progress and divergence in palliativecare education for medical students: A comparative survey of UK course structure, content, delivery, contact with patients and assessment of learning

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Walker, S.
dc.contributor.author Gibbins, J.
dc.contributor.author Barclay, S.
dc.contributor.author Adams, A.
dc.contributor.author Paes, P.
dc.contributor.author Chandratilake, M.
dc.contributor.author Gishen, F.
dc.contributor.author Lodge, P.
dc.contributor.author Wee, B.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-02-29T06:54:34Z
dc.date.available 2016-02-29T06:54:34Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation Palliative medicine. 2016; 30(9): 834-42 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0269-2163 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn 1477-030X (Electronic)
dc.identifier.issn 0269-2163 (Linking)
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/11960
dc.description Indexed in MEDLINE en_US
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Effective undergraduate education is required to enable newly qualified doctors to safely care for patients with palliative care and end-of-life needs. The status of palliative care teaching for UK medical students is unknown. AIM: To investigate palliative care training at UK medical schools and compare with data collected in 2000. DESIGN: An anonymised, web-based multifactorial questionnaire. SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS: Results were obtained from palliative care course organisers at all 30 medical schools in 2013 and compared with 23 medical schools (24 programmes) in 2000. RESULTS: All continue to deliver mandatory teaching on 'last days of life, death and bereavement'. Time devoted to palliative care teaching time varied (2000: 6-100 h, mean 20 h; 2013: 7-98 h, mean 36 h, median 25 h). Current palliative care teaching is more integrated. There was little change in core topics and teaching methods. New features include 'involvement in clinical areas', participation of patient and carers and attendance at multidisciplinary team meetings. Hospice visits are offered (22/24 (92%) vs 27/30 (90%)) although they do not always involve patient contact. There has been an increase in students' assessments (2000: 6/24, 25% vs 2013: 25/30, 83%) using a mixture of formative and summative methods. Some course organisers lack an overview of what is delivered locally. CONCLUSION: Undergraduate palliative care training continues to evolve with greater integration, increased teaching, new delivery methods and wider assessment. There is a trend towards increased patient contact and clinical involvement. A minority of medical schools offer limited teaching and patient contact which could impact on the delivery of safe palliative care by newly qualified doctors. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher SAGE Publications en_US
dc.subject palliativecare education en_US
dc.title Progress and divergence in palliativecare education for medical students: A comparative survey of UK course structure, content, delivery, contact with patients and assessment of learning en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account