Digital Repository

A randomized control study of audio versus visual distraction to reduce patient discomfort during colonoscopy

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author de Silva, A.P.
dc.contributor.author Nandamuni, Y.
dc.contributor.author Rajapakshe, N.N.
dc.contributor.author Nanayakkara, S.
dc.contributor.author Perera, K.R.
dc.contributor.author Kodisinghe, S.K.
dc.contributor.author Subasinghe, S.K.C.
dc.contributor.author Niriella, M.A.
dc.contributor.author Dassanayake, A.S.
dc.contributor.author Pathmeswaran, A.
dc.contributor.author de Silva, H.J.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-12-07T07:07:40Z
dc.date.available 2015-12-07T07:07:40Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.citation Proceedings of the Sri Lanka Medical Association, Anniversary Academic Sessions. 2015; 60(sup 1): 147 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/10623
dc.description Oral Presentation Abstract (OP56), 128th Annual Scientific Sessions, Sri Lanka Medical Association, 6th-8th July 2015 Colombo, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.description.abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Colonoscopy can cause discomfort and anxiety in patients. Heavy sedation as premedication can lead to complications in elderly and those with co-morbidities. This has led to possible use of audio-visual distraction during the procedure. We compared effects of audio versus visual distraction in reducing discomfort during colonoscopy. METHOD: 131 consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy were randomized into three groups: allowed to listen to music of their choice during colonoscopy (AD), allowed to watch a film of their choice (VD) and neither as control (C). Patient controlled sedation (PCS) was administered to all three groups; 25 mg pethidine in 5 mg aliquots and 2.5 mg midazolam in 0.5 mg aliquots. All patients were assessed for pain, number of 'top-ups' of sedation, total dose of pethidine and midazolam and patient cooperation and willingness for a repeat procedure. RESULTS: There were 131 patients (AD=43; VD=44; O44). The AD group had significantly less pain and discomfort (p=0.033) compared to VD and Cgroups. There was no significant difference in number of 'top-ups' of sedation, total doses of pethidine and midazolam among the groups. Better patient cooperation (p=0.002) was evident in ADgroup compared with VD and C groups. There was nt> difference between the AD and VD groups in willingness to undergo a repeat procedure. CONCLUSION: Listening to music of your choice during colonoscopy seems to reduce pain and discomfort and increase the patients' cooperation. This may be a useful and simple tool in screening colonoscopy. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Sri lanka Medical Association en_US
dc.subject visual distraction en_US
dc.title A randomized control study of audio versus visual distraction to reduce patient discomfort during colonoscopy en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Conference Papers
    Papers presented at local and international conferences by the Staff of the Faculty of Medicine

Show simple item record

Search Digital Repository


Browse

My Account