Medicine

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/12

This repository contains the published and unpublished research of the Faculty of Medicine by the staff members of the faculty

Browse

Has files: NoSubject: search.filters.subject.Validation Studies

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Development and validation of sinhala version of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) for assessment of quality of life among cirrhotics
    (Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2012) Ranawaka, C.K.; Pathmeswaran, A.; de Alwis, W.R.S.; Mufeena, M.N.F.; Wijewantha, H.S.; Senanayake, S.M.; Niriella, M.A.; Dassanayake, A.S.; de Silva, A.P.; de Silva, H.J.
    INTRODUCTION: Chronic liver disease (CLD) has a negative impact on patient quality of life (QOL). The Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) is a validated tool which measures the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) among cirrhotics. CLDQ is easy to administer, measures six domains of QOL; abdominal symptoms, fatigue, systemic symptoms, activity, emotional functions and worry. It shows good correlation with severity of CLD. Aims: To develop and validate a Sinhala version of the CLDQ (sCLDQ). METHODS: A standard method of forward and back-translation by bilingual translators was used to develop the sCLDQ. Pilot testing were done with relevant adaptations, considering differences in culture and language. The final version was self-administered to stable CLD patients without significant co-morbidities, together with the WHO BREF Sinhala version (validated for patients of any disease), for comparison. sCLDQ was re-administered 4 weeks later to study its internal consistency and reliability. The sCLDQ validation was assessed by Cronabach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's correlation coefficient RESULTS: Forty eight patients participated in the validation process. The item total correlations of sCLDQ varied from 0.30 to 0.82 (except one item number 0.15). Overall Cronabach's alpha was 0.92. Re-administration of sCLDQ to 15 patients yielded an ICC of 0.54 (p = 0.02). There was a significant correlation (Pearson's r = 0.34; p = 0.03) between sCLDQ and WHO BREF. CONCLUSIONS: sCLDQ was reliable and valid and would be a useful tool to assess QOL of cirrhotic patients in Sri Lanka.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Validation of Sinhala version of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) and evaluation of health related quality of fife among patients with cirrhosis in Sri Lanka
    (Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2013) Miththinda, J.K.N.D.; Ranawaka, C.K.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Dassanayake, A.S.; de Alwis, W.R.S.; Mufeena, M.N.F.; Senanayake, S.M.; Niriella, M.A.; de Silva, A.P.; de Silva, H.J.
    AIMS: Our aim was to validate a Sinhala version of the CLDQ (sCLDQ) and to test its correlation with the degree of liver dysfunction in a cohort of Sri Lankan cirrhotics. METHODS: A standard method was used to translate the CLDQ to Sinhala. Pilot testing was done and relevant cultural and language adaptations made. The final version was self-administered to stable chronic liver disease (CLD) patients, together with the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) validated Sinhala version, for comparison. The sCLDQ was re-administered 4 weeks later to test internal consistency and reliability. The validation was assessed using Cronabach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's correlation coefficient. ANOVA and Pearson's correlation were used to test correlation with the degree of liver dysfunction. RESULTS: Validation was done with 48 subjects, mean age 55.6 (SD 10) years; male 79%. Item total correlations of sCLDQ varied from 0.30-0.82. Overall Cronabach's alpha was 0.92. Re-administration of sCLDQ yielded an ICC of 0.54 (p=0.02). There was a significant correlation between sCLDQ and WHOQOL-BREF (r=0.34; p=0.03). Validated sCLDQ xvas administered to a different cohort of 202 cirrhotics with mean age of 55.3 years (SD 10,5); male 77%; mean duration of cirrhosis 2.7 years (SD 2.9) years. Higher Child class (F=0.000; p-0.017) and hyponatraemia (r=0.2I3; p=0.005) were associated with worse sCLDQ scores. There was no significant association between sCLDQ score and MELD (r=-0.128, p=0.072). CONCLUSIONS: The sCLDQ is a reliable and valid tool to assess QOL of Sri Lankan cirrhotics and it correlates with known indices of disease severity.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Validation of a clinical scoring system to detect gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in epidemiological surveys
    (Wiley Blackwell Scientific Publications, 2006) Amarasiri, L; Pathmeswaran, A.; Ranasinghe, C.; de Silva, H.J.
    BACKGROUND: The prevalence of GERD is increasing worldwide. Community prevalence in Sri Lanka is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To develop a clinical score to screen for GERD in the community and assess whether a score using symptom frequency and severity correlates better to an objective measure of GERD than one using only symptom frequency. METHODS: A cross-sectional validity study carried out on 72 patients (endoscopy positive) and 75 controls (comparable in age and gender). All faced a GERD-specific interviewer-administered questionnaire assessing seven upper gastro-intestinal symptoms, each graded for frequency (4- items) and severity (5-items). Two scores were generated. Score 1: sum of frequency of symptoms and score 2: sum of products of frequency and severity of each symptom. All patients underwent 24 h pH-metry. Validity established by correlating symptom scores with 24 h pH-metry parameters. Cut-off values determined by receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Mean scores of cases were significantly higher than controls (p < 0.001). Cut-off score for score 1 was ≥11.50 (sensitivity 91.7%, speci- ficity 82.7%, positive and negative predictive values 70.0% and 95.9%). Cut-off score for score 2 was ≥14.50 (sensitivity 94.4%, specificity 78.7%, positive and negative predictive values 66.0% and 97.0%). Both scores showed high reproducibility (intra-class correlation coefficient of score 1 = 0.95 and score 2 = 0.89). There was good correlation between symptom scores and 24-h pH parameters (Spearman rank correlation, p = 0.01), but score 2 showed a significantly better correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Our GERD questionnaire is valid, reproducible, with better correlation with an objective test when both severity and frequency of symptoms were scored
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Development and validation of sinhala version of the chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) for assessment of quality of life among cirrhotics
    (Wiley Blackwell Scientific Publications, 2012) Ranawaka, C.K.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Senanayake, S.M.; de Alwis, R.; Mufeena, M.N.F.; Niriella, M.A.; Dassanayake, A.S.; de Silva, A.P.; de Silva, H.J.
    BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chronic liver disease (CLD) has a negative impact on patient quality of life (QOL). The Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) is a validated tool which measures the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) among cirrhotics. CLDQ is easy to administer and measures six domains of QOL; abdominal symptoms, fatigue, systemic symptoms, activity, emotional functions and worry. It shows good correlation with severity of CLD. No tool had been developed previously to asses QOL among CLD patients in Sri Lanka. Aim of this study was to develop and validate a Sinhala version of the CLDQ (sCLDQ). METHODS: A standard method of forward and back-translation by bilingual translators was employed to develop the sCLDQ. Pilot testing was done with relevant linguistic and cultural adaptations. The final version was self-administered to stable CLD patients without significant comorbidities, together with the WHO BREF Sinhala version (a validated QOL assessment tool for any disease), for comparison. sCLDQ was re-administered 4 weeks later to study its internal consistency and reliability. The sCLDQ validation was assessed by Cronabach’s alpha, intraclass correlation coeffi cient (ICC) and Pearson’s correlation coeffi cient. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Forty eight patients participated in the validation process. The item total correlations of sCLDQ varied from 0.30 to 0.82 (except one item, 0.15). Overall Cronabach’s alpha was 0.92. Re-administration of sCLDQ to 15 patients yielded an ICC of 0.54 (p = 0.02). There was a signifi cant correlation (Pearson’s r = 0.34; p = 0.03) between sCLDQ and WHO BREF. Conclusion: sCLDQ was reliable and valid and would be a useful tool to assess QOL among cirrhotic patients in Sri Lanka.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Development and validation of Sinhala version of the chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ)
    (Wiley Blackwell Scientific Publications, 2013) Miththinda, J.K.N.D.; Ranawaka, C.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Dassanayake, A.S.; de Alwis, W.R.S.; Mufeena, M.N.F.; Senanayake, S.M.; Niriella, M.A.; de Silva, A.P.; de Silva, H.J.
    OBJECTIVE: The Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) is a validated tool measuring the Health Related Quality of Life among cirrhotics. Aim of this study was to develop and validate a Sinhala version of the CLDQ (sCLDQ) and to test its correlation with the degree of liver dysfunction in a cohort of Sri Lankan patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: A standard translation method was used to develop the sCLDQ. Pilot testing was done with relevant cultural and language adaptations. The final version was self-administered to stable CLD patients, together with the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) validated Sinhala version, for comparison. sCLDQ was re administered 4 weeks later to test internal consistency and reliability. The validation was assessed by Cronabach’s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. ANOVA and Pearson’s correlation were used to test correlation with the degree of liver dysfunction. RESULTS: Validation was done with 214 subjects, mean age 55.6 (SD 10.4) years; male 77.6%. Overall Cronabach’s alpha was 0.926. Itra-class correlations varied from 0.431 to 0.912 and all were significant (p 0.000). Retesting was done on a sub-sample of 18 subjects. Test-retest correlation was 0.695 (p 0.008). WHO-BREF was applied on a sub-sample of 48 subjects. There was a significant correlation (Pearson’s r = 0.391; p = 0.004) between sCLDQ and WHOQOL BREF. sCLDQ was significantly associated with MELD (r = −0.13; p = 0.038), MELD Sodium (r = −0.223; p = 0.002), Bilirubin (r = −0.124; p = 0.036), Serum Sodium (r = 0.172; p = 0.009), Serum Albumin (r = 0.201; p = 0.003) and Child grade (f = 3.687; p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: sCLDQ is a reliable and valid tool to assess QoL of Sri Lankan cirrhotics and correlates well with known indices of disease severity.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Identifying the biting species in snakebite by clinical features: an epidemiological tool for community surveys
    (Oxford University Press, 2006) Pathmeswaran, A.; Kasturiratne, A.; Fonseka, M.; Nandasena, S.; Lalloo, D.G.; de Silva, H.J.
    The outcome of snakebite is related to the biting species but it is often difficult to identify the biting snake, particularly in community settings. We have developed a clinical scoring system suitable for use in epidemiological surveys, with the main aim of identifying the presumed biting species in those with systemic envenoming who require treatment. The score took into account ten features relating to bites of the five medically important snakes in Sri Lanka, and an algorithm was developed applying different weightings for each feature for different species. A systematically developed artificial data set was used to fine tune the score and to develop criteria for definitive identification. The score was prospectively validated using 134 species-confirmed snakebites. It correctly differentiated the bites caused by the three snakes that commonly cause major clinical problems (Russell's viper (RV), kraits and cobra) from other snakes (hump-nosed viper (HNV) and saw-scaled viper (SSV)) with 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity. For individual species, sensitivity and specificity were, respectively: cobra 76%, 99%; kraits 85%, 99%; and RV 70%, 99%. As anticipated, the score was insensitive in the identification of bites due to HNV and SSV
All items in this Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. No item in the repository may be reproduced for commercial or resale purposes.