Medicine

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/12

This repository contains the published and unpublished research of the Faculty of Medicine by the staff members of the faculty

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Randomized controlled trial of fresh frozen plasma for coagulopathy in Russell's viper (Daboia russelii) envenoming
    (Wiley-Blackwell, 2017) Isbister, G.K.; Jayamanne, S.; Mohamed, F.; Dawson, A.H.; Maduwage, K.; Gawarammana, I.; Lalloo, D.G.; de Silva, H.J.; Scorgie, F.E.; Lincz, L.F.; Buckley, N.A.
    BACKGROUND: Russell's viper (Daboia russelii) envenoming is a major health issue in South Asia and causes venom induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC). OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effect of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and two antivenom doses in correcting VICC. METHODS: We undertook an open-label randomized controlled trial in patients with VICC at two Sri Lankan hospitals. Patients with suspected Russell's viper bites and coagulopathy were randomly allocated (1:1) high-dose antivenom (20 vials) or low-dose antivenom (10 vials) plus 4U FFP. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an international normalized ratio (INR)<2, 6h post-antivenom. Secondary outcomes included anaphylaxis, major haemorrhage, death and clotting factor recovery. RESULTS: From 214 eligible patients, 141 were randomized; 71 to high-dose antivenom, 70 to low-dose antivenom/FFP; five had no post-antivenom bloods. The groups were similar except for a delay of 1h in antivenom administration for FFP patients. 6h post-antivenom 23/69 (33%) patients allocated high-dose antivenom had an INR<2 compared with 28/67 (42%) allocated low-dose antivenom/FFP [absolute difference 8%;95%Confidence Interval:-8% to 25%]. 15 patients allocated FFP did not receive it. Severe anaphylaxis occurred equally frequently in each group. One patient given FFP developed transfusion related acute lung injury. Three deaths occurred in low-dose/FFP patients including one intracranial haemorrhage. There was no difference in recovery rates of INR or fibrinogen, but more rapid initial recovery of factor V and X in FFP patients. CONCLUSION: FFP post-antivenom in Russell's viper bites didn't hasten recovery of coagulopathy. Low-dose antivenom/FFP did not worsen VICC, suggesting low-dose antivenom is sufficient. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
  • Item
    Snake antivenom for snake venom induced consumption coagulopathy
    (Update Software, 2015) Maduwage, K.; Buckley, N.A.; de Silva, H.J.; Lalloo, D.G.; Isbister, G.K.
    BACKGROUND : Snake venom induced consumption coagulopathy is a major systemic effect of envenoming. Observational studies suggest that antivenom improves outcomes for venom induced consumption coagulopathy in some snakebites and not others. However, the effectiveness of snake antivenom in all cases of venom induced consumption coagulopathy is controversial. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of snake antivenom as a treatment for venom induced consumption coagulopathy in people with snake bite. SEARCH METHODS The search was done on 30 January 2015. We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily and Ovid OLDMEDLINE(R), Embase Classic+Embase (OvidSP), three other sources, clinical trials registers, and we also screened reference lists.SELECTION CRITERIA : All completed, published or unpublished, randomised, controlled trials with a placebo or no treatment arm, where snake antivenom was administered for venom induced consumption coagulopathy in humans with snake bites. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors reviewed the identified trials and independently applied the selection criteria. MAIN RESULTS No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Randomised placebo-controlled trials are required to investigate the effectiveness of snake antivenom for clinically relevant outcomes in patients with venom induced consumption coagulopathy resulting from snake bite. Although ethically difficult, the routine administration of a treatment that has a significant risk of anaphylaxis cannot continue without strong evidence of benefit.
  • Item
    Anti-venom for snake bite in Sri Lanka
    (Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2002) de Silva, H.J.; Fonseka, M.M.D.; Gunatilake, S.B.; Sellahewa, K.H.; Kularatne, S.A.M.
    No Abstract Available
  • Item
    Use of antivenom serum in snake bite: a prospective study of hospital practice in the Gampaha district
    (Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2000) Seneviratne, S.L.; Opanayaka, C.J.; Ratnayake, N.S L.A.; Sarathkumara, K.E.; Sugathadasa, A.M.; Weerasuriya, N.; Wickrama, W.A.S.S.; Gunatilake, S.B.; de Silva, H.J.
    OBJECTIVE: To record current practices in hospital management of snake bite, especially with regard to use of antivenom serum (AVS). METHODS: Management of all snake bite victims admitted to the four main hospitals of the Gampaha district was prospectively studied during a 5-month period. A pretested data collection sheet was used. Relevant information was obtained from patients, accompanying persons, medical staff and hospital records. RESULTS: 466 patients (M:F = 7:3; 402 adults and 64 children) were admitted following snake bite during the study. The offending snake was identified in 357 (76.6 percent) cases [172 (36.9percent) by examining the dead snake, 185 by identification of the snake in a photograph]. 273 (76.5 percent) of the 357 admissions were due to hump nosed viper bite. AVS was given to 184 (39.5 percent) patients, including 99 (36.3 percent) with hump nosed viper bite. A sensitivity test of AVS was used in all 184 patients. Premedication with hydrocortisone and/or antihistamines before AVS infusion was given to 89 patients. Acute adverse reactions to AVS occurred in 102 (55.4 percent) patients given AVS. There was no significant difference in the rate of reactions whether premedication was given or not. CONCLUSION: Precise identification of the offending snake was not possible in many instances. Practices that are of no benefit in the treatment of snake bite are still widely used. Acute adverse reactions to AVS are common, and neither hydrocortisone nor antihistamines seem to be of benefit as prophylaxis. Evidence based management guidelines, especially with regard to AVS therapy, are urgently required.
All items in this Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. No item in the repository may be reproduced for commercial or resale purposes.