Medicine
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/12
This repository contains the published and unpublished research of the Faculty of Medicine by the staff members of the faculty
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Effect of audio and visual distraction on patients undergoing colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study(Stuttgart : Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2016) de Silva, A.P.; Niriella, M.A.; Nandamuni, Y.; Nanayakkara, S.D.; Perera, K.R.P.; Kodisinghe, S.K.; Subasinghe, K.C.E.; Pathmeswaran, A.; de Silva, H.J.BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS : Colonoscopy can cause anxiety and discomfort in patients. Sedation and analgesia as premedication can lead to complications in the elderly and those with comorbidities. This has led to an interest in the use of audio-visual distraction during the colonoscopy. We compared the effects of audio (AD) versus visual distraction (VD) in reducing discomfort and the need for sedation during colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized into three groups: one group was allowed to listen to the music of their choice (AD), the second group was allowed to watch a movie of their choice (VD), and the third group was not allowed either distraction during colonoscopy and acted as a control (C). Patient controlled analgesia and sedation were administered to all three groups. We used 25 mg of pethidine in 5-mg aliquots and 2.5 mg of midazolam in 0.5-mg aliquots. All patients were assessed for perceived pain and willingness to repeat the procedure. Number of "top-ups" of sedation and total dose of pethidine and midazolam were noted. Patient cooperation and ease of procedure were assessed by the colonoscopist. RESULTS: In total, 200 patients were recruited [AD, n = 66 (32 males, median age 57 years); VD, n = 67 (43 males, median age 58 years); C, n = 67 (35 males, median age 59 years)]. The AD group had significantly less pain (P = 0.001), better patient cooperation (P = 0.001) and willingness to undergo a repeat procedure (P = 0.024) compared with VD and C groups. CONCLUSIONS: AD reduces pain and discomfort, improves patient cooperation and willingness to undergo a repeat procedure, and seems a useful, simple adjunct to low dose sedation during colonoscopy.Item The Prone 12 o'clock position reduces iIleal intubation time during colonoscopy compared to the left lateral 6 o'clock (standard) position(American Gastroenterological Association(AGA) Institute, Published by Elsevier Inc., 2010) de Silva, A.P.; Kumarasena, R.S.; Keragala, S.P.; Udayapushpa, K.V.; Niriella, M.A.; Dassanayake, A.S.; Pathmeswaran, A.; de Silva, H.J.INTRODUCTION Ileal intubation is the gold standard for evidence of a complete colonoscopy. However, despite evidence of clinical benefit, ileoscopy is not always attempted due to perceived technical difficulty. Although several studies have previously reported on the time taken for ileal intubation, such timings have not been standardized. Aim To compare time taken for ileal intubation using a new position - the prone 12 o’clock position (PP) - with the standard method (left lateral 6 o’clock position-LLP). METHODS We first performed a pilot study using fluoroscopy to determine the best patient position for the most direct (end-on) approach to the ileo-caecal valve. The prone 12 o’clock position appeared to be the best position. We then randomized consecutive patients having colonoscopy, aged 18-80 years and who were not pregnant, to undergo ileoscopy in the standard position or the prone 12 o’clock position. After the ileo-caecal valve was identified during colonoscopy, ileal intubation time was standardized and defined as the time taken for the tip of the colonoscope to be maneuvered from the mid-point of the caecum to entering the terminal ileum. RESULTS Colonoscopy was performed on 150 patients [82 females, mean (SD) age 53 (16) years]. 75 patients were randomized for ileal intubation in the PP and 75 patients in the LLP. Overall, the ileum was successfully intubated in 145 (96%) patients [74 (98.7%) in the PP and71 (94.7%) in the LLP]. The mean (SD) ileal intubation time was 26.4 (63) seconds in the PP and 96.9 (112) seconds in the LLP (p0.0001; Student t-test). The ileum was abnormal in 11 (7.5%) patients: 6 in the PP group and 5 in the LLP group. CONCLUSIONS During colonoscopy, the prone 12 o’clock position gives a more direct approach to the ileo-caecal valve and significantly reduces ileal intubation time when compared to the standard left lateral 6 o’clock positionItem A Randomized control study of audio versus visual distraction to reduce patient discomfort during colonoscopy(American Gastroenterological Association(AGA) Institute, Published by Elsevier Inc., 2015) de Silva, A.P.; Nandamuni, Y.; Nanayakkara, S.; Perera, K.R.; Kodisinghe, S.K.; Subasinghe, S.K.C.; Niriella, M.A.; Dassanayake, A.S.; Pathmeswaran, A.; de Silva, H.J.INTRODUCTION : Colonoscopy can cause anxiety and discomfort in patients who undergo this procedure. Heavy sedation and analgesia as premedication can lead to complications in the elderly and those with co-morbidities. This has led to an interest in use of audio-visual distraction during the colonoscopy as an adjunct. Our aim was to compare effects of audio (AD) versus visual distraction (VD) in reducing discomfort and need for sedation during colonoscopy. METHODS : Consecutive consenting patients who were undergoing colonoscopy were randomized into three groups: one group was allowed to listen to the music of their choice (AD), the second group was allowed to watch a film of their choice (VD) (using SONY head mounted display:HMZ-T3W-H) and the third group with neither during colonoscopy acted as a control (C). Patient controlled sedation (PCS) was administered to all three groups. We used 25 mg pethidine in 5 mg aliquots and 2.5 mg midazolam in 0.5 mg aliquots. All patients were assessed for pain, number of ‘top-ups’ of sedation, total dose of pethidine and midazolam, patient cooperation and willingness to repeat the procedure. RESULTS :There were 77 patients [AD, n=25 (16 males, median age 57 years); VD, n=26, (18 males, median age 58 years); C, n=26 (10 males, median age 59 years)]. The AD group had significantly less pain (p=0.048), number of ‘top-ups’ of sedation (p=0.03), total doses of pethidine (p=0.03) and midazolam (p=0.032), and better patient cooperation (p=0.001) compared with controls. There was no difference between the AD (72%) and VD (73%) groups in willingness to undergo a repeat procedure. Conclusions AD reduces pain and discomfort and the requirement for sedation and seems a useful and simple adjunct to low dose sedation use during colonoscopy.