Medicine
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/12
This repository contains the published and unpublished research of the Faculty of Medicine by the staff members of the faculty
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Premorbid blood pressure control of incident transient ischaemic attacks and strokes; prevalence and determinants; Analysis of individual patient data over 10 Years(Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2017) Mettananda, C.; Li, L.; Lau, G.; Wharton, R.; Bull, L.; McCulloch, E.; Welch, S.; Mehta, Z.; Silver, L.; Rothwell, P.; Oxford Vascular StudyBACKGROUND: Uncontrolled blood pressure is the most important modifiable risk factor for strokes. AIMS AND METHODS: We determined the prevalence and determinants of blood pressure control in patients with incident transient ischaemic attacks(TIA) and strokes from 2002-2012 in a population-based cohort(Oxford Vascular Study). Controlled blood pressure(BP) was defined as having BP<140/90mmHg and was studied in different cardiovascular risk groups according to the Framingham 10-year general cardiovascular risk(CV-Risk) predicted at time of event and 10years pre-event; low(≤ 10%), moderate(11-19%) and high(≥ 20%) risk. We also studied the associations of controlled BP adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: Among 1741 patients with incident TIA/strokes, 1051 (60.4%) had known hypertension, of which 891 (84.8%) were on anti-hypertensive treatment. However, only 698 (40.1%) of all and 306 (29.1%) of treated patients had controlled BP. On predicted 10-year CV-Risk at event, 861 (72.5%) of 1188 (77.0%) in high risk group had known hypertension, of which 758 (88.0%) were on treatment. However, only 346 (29.1%) of all in high-risk group and 190 (25.1%) of treated high risk patients had controlled BP. In contrast, 120 (88.2%) of 136 (8.8%) in low risk group had controlled BP. Risk stratification without scoring for BP showed consistent results except the number in high-risk group dropped to 863 (55.9%). Analysis with CV-risk 10years pre-event also showed similar trends. Age(adjusted OR=0.97, 95%CI=0.97-0.98, p<0.001), high CV-risk at event/10years pre-event (0.97, 0.95-0.99, p<0.013, 0.95-0.99, p=0.008), being treated for hypertension(0.43, 0.35-0.52, p<0.001), BMI≥ 30Kg/m2(0.72, 0.55-0.92, p=0.010) and high total cholesterol(0.91, 0.84-0.99, p<0.026) were negatively associated with controlled BP. However history of atrial fibrillation(1.35, 1.03-1.77, p=0.030) and physical dependency(modified-Rankin-Scale>2; 1.54, 1.15-2.06, p<0.001) were positively associated with controlled BP. CONCLUSIONS: Premorbid blood pressure control in patients with incident TIA/strokes was inadequate especially in high-risk patients. Controlling BP to targets in elderly and high CV-risk patients would be important in reducing incident TIA/strokes.Item Epidemiology of stroke subtypes and aetiology among Sri Lankan stroke patients(Sage Publishing, 2020) Mettananda, C.; Wettasinghe, L,; Eshani, M.D.P.; Ranawaka, U.BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prevalence of stroke is on the rise in south Asia and the epidemiology is different to western countries. However, prevalence of stroke subtypes and aetiology is not reported of Sri Lanka. Therefore, we aimed to describe the same of Sri Lanka. METHODS: We analyzed all the acute stroke admissions to a stroke unit of a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka over 5 year from October 2013 to 2018. Data were collected prospectively using an interviewer administered questionnaire by interviewing patients and perusing medical records. Ischaemic strokes were classified on OCSP (Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project) and TOAST(Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) classifications RESULTS: 891 patients were admitted to stroke unit over 5 years; 765(85.5%) ischaemic strokes, 129 (14.5%) intracerebral haemorrhages (ICH), and 0(0%) sub-arachnoid haemorrhages (SAH). Of the ischemic strokes 16(1.8%) were total anterior circulation, 253(29.0%) partial anterior circulation, 543(62.3%) lacunar, 59(6.8%) posterior circulation infarcts on OCSP classification. 542 of ischaemic stroke patients who had complete investigations for TOAST classification were studied for aetiology of stroke. Atrial fibrillation was reported in only 14(2.7%) and more than 50% carotid stenosis was seen in 22(4.1%) ischaemic stroke patients. 17(3.1%) were of large artery atherosclerosis, 369(68.1%) small vessel occlusion, 11(2.0%) cardioembolic and 145(26.8%) undermined aetiology. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of ischaemic strokes, ICH and SAH were not different to western statistics in this Sri Lankan cohort of stroke patients. However, cardio-embolic and large artery strokes were less common compared to west and lacunar strokes were the commonest of ischemic strokes.Item Stroke awareness in patients with incident stroke compared to patients without stroke or ischemic heart disease(Demos Publications, 2020) Ranawaka, U.; Mettananda, C.; Thilakarathna, C.; Peiris, A.; Kasturiratne, A.; Tilakaratna, Y.BACKGROUND: Stroke awareness is known to influence treatment seeking and risk reduction behavior, but there is limited data from Sri Lanka and South Asia. AIM: To describe stroke awareness in incident stroke patients and to compare with patients without stroke and/or ischemic heart disease (IHD) in a Sri Lankan tertiary-care center. METHODS: We studied awareness of stroke in all incident stroke patients admitted to a tertiary-care center in Sri Lanka and compared with a group of age- and sex-matched patients without stroke and/or IHD, over 2 years. Knowledge on stroke mechanisms, risk factors, symptoms, prognosis, treatment, and prevention were evaluated using a 40-item interviewer-administered questionnaire and converted to a composite score of 100%. Total awareness was categorized as Very poor (<24%), Poor (25%-49%), Good (50%-74%), and Very good (>74%). RESULTS: One hundred and sixty four incident stroke patients (mean age 62.0 ± 11.5 years; 64.6% males) and 164 patients without stroke and/or IHD were studied. Mean stroke awareness was 47.79% ± 14.6 in stroke patients, and 47.73% ± 14.9 in the nonstroke and/or IHD patients (P = .95). Of the associations studied, better stroke awareness (>50%) was associated only with higher education levels (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.33-2.72, P < .001) in stroke patients. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke awareness is not satisfactory in incident stroke patients and is no better than in patients without stroke and/or IHD. Better stroke awareness was associated with higher education levels. Keywords: Sri Lanka; Stroke; awareness; comparison; stroke-patients.