Medicine
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/12
This repository contains the published and unpublished research of the Faculty of Medicine by the staff members of the faculty
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item First co-infection of malaria and hepatitis E diagnosed in Sri Lanka(Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2023) Senarathne, S.; Rajapakse, S.; de Silva, H.J.; Seneviratne, S.; Chulasiri, P.; Fernando, D.INTRODUCTION: Imported malaria cases continue to be reported in Sri Lanka. Similarly, hepatitis E is also considered a travel associated imported disease in Sri Lanka. This is a report of the first co-infection of malaria and hepatitis E in Sri Lanka. OBJECTIVES: A 21-year-old European who visited Sri Lanka after a 2 months stay in India, was admitted to hospital with fever, vomiting, abdominal pain, and dark-coloured urine on the 4th day after his arrival. On examination, he had splenomegaly but no hepatomegaly. He had thrombocytopaenia; 89% neutrophils; 9% lymphocytes; elevated liver enzymes and hyperbilirubinaemia. Urine was positive for bile pigment. METHODS: Considering his travel history to India, he was tested for malaria. The rapid diagnostic test became positive for Plasmodium falciparum while microscopy showed P. falciparum ring stages with a parasite density of 120/μl. He was treated as for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria with oral Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy. The patient became fever-free and blood smears became negative after 13 hours following 2 doses of antimalarials. RESULTS: However, his liver functions were further deranged with apparent jaundice (ALT: 250 U/L; AST: 175 U/L; ALP: 130 U/L; GGT: 179 U/L; total bilirubin: 10.65 mg/dL; direct bilirubin: 8.08 mg/dL; indirect bilirubin: 2.57 mg/dL). Further blood tests detected hepatitis E-specific IgM antibodies. He was treated with oral ursodiol but no specific antiviral was given. Following the completion of antimalarials, he was discharged from the hospital upon clinical recovery. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be vigilant on travel-associated co-infections in patients who are diagnosed with imported malaria.Item A Comparative analysis of the outcome of malaria case surveillance strategies in Sri Lanka in the prevention of re-establishment phase(BioMed Central, 2021) Gunasekera, W.M.K.T.A.W.; Premaratne, R.; Fernando, D.; Munaz, M.; Piyasena, M.G.Y.; Perera, D.; Wickremasinghe, R.; Ranaweera, K.D.N.P.; Mendis, K.BACKGROUND: Sri Lanka sustained its malaria-free status by implementing, among other interventions, three core case detection strategies namely Passive Case Detection (PCD), Reactive Case Detection (RACD) and Proactive Case Detection (PACD). The outcomes of these strategies were analysed in terms of their effectiveness in detecting malaria infections for the period from 2017 to 2019. METHODS: Comparisons were made between the surveillance methods and between years, based on data obtained from the national malaria database and individual case reports of malaria patients. The number of blood smears examined microscopically was used as the measure of the volume of tests conducted. The yield from each case detection method was calculated as the proportion of blood smears which were positive for malaria. Within RACD and PACD, the yield of sub categories of travel cohorts and spatial cohorts was ascertained for 2019. RESULTS: A total of 158 malaria cases were reported in 2017-2019. During this period between 666,325 and 725,149 blood smears were examined annually. PCD detected 95.6 %, with a yield of 16.1 cases per 100,000 blood smears examined. RACD and PACD produced a yield of 11.2 and 0.3, respectively. The yield of screening the sub category of travel cohorts was very high for RACD and PACD being 806.5 and 44.9 malaria cases per 100,000 smears, respectively. Despite over half of the blood smears examined being obtained by screening spatial cohorts within RACD and PACD, the yield of both was zero over all three years. CONCLUSIONS: The PCD arm of case surveillance is the most effective and, therefore, has to continue and be further strengthened as the mainstay of malaria surveillance. Focus on travel cohorts within RACD and PACD should be even greater. Screening of spatial cohorts, on a routine basis and solely because people are resident in previously malarious areas, may be wasteful, except in situations where the risk of local transmission is very high, or is imminent. These findings may apply more broadly to most countries in the post-elimination phase. KEYWORDS: Active case detection; Malaria case surveillance; Malaria in Sri Lanka; Passive case detection; Prevention of re-establishment of malaria; Proactive case detection; Reactive case detection; Spatial cohorts; Travel cohorts; Yield.