Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9669
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWiiesinahe, C.A.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, S.S.
dc.contributor.authorDolawatta, N.
dc.contributor.authorWimalaratne, A.K.G.P.
dc.contributor.authorKasturiratne, A.
dc.contributor.authorWijewickrema, B.
dc.contributor.authorJayamanne, S.F.
dc.contributor.authorLalloo, D.G.
dc.contributor.authorIsbister, G.K.
dc.contributor.authorDawson, A.
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, H.J.
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-17T09:37:49Z
dc.date.available2015-09-17T09:37:49Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationThe Ceylon Medical Journal. 2014; 59(Supplement 1):13en_US
dc.identifier.issn0009-0875 (Print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9669
dc.descriptionOral Presentation Abstract (OP12), 127th Annual Scientific Sessions, Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2014 Colombo, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There is significant delayed psychological morbidity and negative psycho-social impact following snakebite. However, no psychological support is provided to victims. We aimed to develop and assess the effectiveness of a brief intervention which can be provided by non-specialist medical officers aimed at reducing psychological morbidity. METHODS: In a single blind clinical trial at Polonnaruwa Hospital, 187 snakebite victims were randomised into three arms. One arm received no psychological intervention (Group A; n=59; control). Group B (n=60) received psychoeducation at discharge from hospital. Group C (n=68) received psychoeducation and a.second intervention one month later based on cognitive behavioural principles. All patients were assessed six months after discharge from hospital using standardised tools for presence of psychological symptoms and level of functioning. RESULTS: Compared with Group A, there was a significant reduction in anxiety symptoms measured by the Hopkins Psychiatric Symptom check list (16.9% vs. 5.9%, p=0.047, Chi-Squared test) and a non-significant trend towards improvement in the level of functioning measured by the Sheehan Disability inventory (6.47 vs. 4.69) in Group C, but not in Group B. There was no difference in rates of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings suggest that brief psychological interventions which include psychoeducation plus cognitive behavioural therapy given by non-specialist doctors, but not psychoeducation alone seem to reduce anxiety and facilitate a trend towards improved function in snakebite victims. However, these interventions had no effect on depression or PTSD.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSri Lanka Medical Associationen_US
dc.subjectSnake Bitesen_US
dc.subjectSnake Bites-psychologyen
dc.titleDevelopment and assessment of a psychological intervention for snakebite victimsen_US
dc.typeConference Abstracten_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.