Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9668
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, S.H.P.
dc.contributor.authorLiyanage, I.K.
dc.contributor.authorRajapakse, L.C.
dc.contributor.authorJayasinghe, K.S.A.
dc.contributor.authorKotulanda, P.
dc.contributor.authorWijeyaratne, C.N.
dc.contributor.authorWijeratne, S.
dc.contributor.authorHaniffa, R.
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-17T09:26:24Z
dc.date.available2015-09-17T09:26:24Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationThe Ceylon Medical Journal. 2014; 59(Supplement 1):10-11en_US
dc.identifier.issn0009-0875 (Print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9668
dc.descriptionOral Presentation Abstract (OP07), 120th Annual Scientific Sessions, Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2014 Colombo, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To describe social, cultural and economic determinants of obesity in a representative population in Kalutara METHODS: A cross sectional survey carried out among adults of 35 to 64 years. Applying a stratified random duster sampling method from urban, rural and plantation sectors, 1300 participants were selected. Data gathered using an interviewer administered questionnaire. The body mass index of 23.01 kg/m2-27.50kg/ m2 was considered as overweight and >27.51kg/m2 as obese. Waist circumference (WC) of >90cm and >80cm was regarded as high for men and women respectively. Significance of prevalence of diseases and risk factors across different socio-economic strata were determined by chi square test for trend. RESULTS: Of 1234 adults who were screened age and sex adjusted prevalence of overweight, obesity and abdominal obesity (high WC) were 33.2%, 14.3% and 33.6% respectively. The Muslim population had the highest prevalence of all three categories. Sector, education, income, social status quintiles and area level deprivation categories show-an inverse gradient in obesity categories, mean BM! and mean WC. The differences observed for mean BM! and mean WC between the lowest and .highest groups in these socioeconomic factors were significant. CONCLUSION: There is an inverse gradient of overweight, obese and centrally obese with higher prevalence observed in the more affluent, educated, urban and high income segments of society. In Sri Lanka those in the higher socio economic categories are still at a higher risk of being overweight, obese and having abdominal obesity.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSri Lanka Medical Associationen_US
dc.subjectSocial determinants of obesityen_US
dc.titleSocial determinants of obesity in Kalutara Districten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.