Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9582
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoshini, A.A.N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, D.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChandratilake, M.N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPathmeswaran, A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-16T04:53:17Zen_US
dc.date.available2015-09-16T04:53:17Zen_US
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Ceylon Medical Journal. 2007; 52(Supplement 1):35en_US
dc.identifier.issn0009-0875 (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9582
dc.descriptionPoster Presentation Abstract (PP16), 120th Annual Scientific Sessions, Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2007 Colombo, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using a method of peer assessment of individualized effort during group work and to validate it. DESIGN, SETTING AND METHODS: At the end of a module during the 2nd year, 12 groups of medical students (consisting of 13-14 students per group) made a presentation. Foilowing the presentation, the students assessed the contribution of each of their colleagues towards the presentation by using a rating form. This form listed the members of the group and consisted of a global assessment of each student's contribution to group work as well as assessment of contribution in eight different ways. An individualized mark was calculated for each student by summarizing the scores assigned to him/ her by other group members. Each student was given their personal mark and was asked for their reaction. RESULTS: Peer assessment marks were available for all 164 students. Nineteen (11.6%) students had got less than 50 marks. Though 11 of these students were not satisfied with their mark, 12 (63%) accepted that the mark reflected their contribution. Among those who had scored 50 or more marks, 87% were satisfied with their marks and 88% stated that the marks reflected their contribution to group work. CONCLUSION: The second year medical students taking part in this study were prepared to assess their peers and most of them were satisfied with the marks allocated by their peers. Over 60% of those who scored less than 50 marks accepted that their mark was a fair reflection of their contribution to group work.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSri Lanka Medical Associationen_US
dc.subjectPeer evaluationen_US
dc.titlePeer evaluation of individual effort in student group worken_US
dc.typeConference Abstracten_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.