Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9572
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gunaratne, P.A.K.G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gurugama, N.P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kularatne, W.A.I. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kularatne, S.A.M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | de Silva, H.J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-15T10:38:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-15T10:38:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The Ceylon Medical Journal. 2007; 52(Supplement 1):11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0009-0875 (Print) | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9572 | - |
dc.description | Oral Presentation Abstract (OP11), 120th Annual Scientific Sessions, Sri Lanka Medical Association, 2007 Colombo, Sri Lanka | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | INTRODUCTION: Despite considerable public interest in legalizing physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in many parts of the world, littie is known about physicians' attitudes toward these practices in Sri Lanka. OBJECTIVE: To assess attitudes of physicians towards end of life care and decision making. DESIGN, SETTING AND METHODS: Data were collected using a pre-tested self-administered questionnaire distributed among 450 physicians and aspiring physicians attending two Annual Academic Sessions. RESULTS: Sixty-six consultant physicians and 204 non-consultant doctors responded to the questionnaire (60% response rate). 262 (97%) were in agreement of palliative care and 63 (23%) of them believed in delivering the best possible care for the terminally ill. 218 (81%) indicated that they would use morphine as a mode of pain relief. But only 51 (19%) doctors said they would administer morphine knowing that it might cause death due to respiratory depression, implying their agreement to the concept of the 'doctrine of double effect'. More consultants [43 (65%)] than other doctors [80 (40%)] would give a 'do not resuscitate" order (p<0.01). Only 30 (11%) of all doctors agreed with active euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide in some instances; the majority [207 (76%)] disagreed with any form of active euthanasia (morally and ethically) for terminally ill patients, even when patients request it. CONCLUSIONS: The majority Sri Lankan physicians are in favour of palliative care for terminally ill patients. More consultants than other doctors would give a 'do not resuscitate' order. The majority would not offer any form of active euthanasia and believe it is morally and ethically incorrect. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sri Lanka Medical Association | en_US |
dc.subject | Oflife decisions | en_US |
dc.title | Attitudes of Sri Lankan physicians towards end oflife decisions and care | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Conference Papers |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.