Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/8971
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWijegunawardana, N.D.A.D.
dc.contributor.authorHapangama, H.A.D.C.
dc.contributor.authorGunawardene, Y.I.N.S.
dc.contributor.authorManamperi, A.
dc.contributor.authorAbeyewickreme, W.
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-26T12:25:21Z
dc.date.available2015-07-26T12:25:21Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the Sri Lanka Association for the Advancement of Science. 2009; 65 (Part I): 5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/8971
dc.descriptionSri Lanka Association for the Advancement of Science, 65th Annual Sessions Abstracts(104A), 7th-11th December 2009. Colomboen_US
dc.description.abstractSome methods of mosquito population control, especially the application of pesticides for adult mosquitoes, can have an impact on the environment and individuals with a heightened sensitivity to pesticides. Of the available control tools, biological controls are considered to be generally host-specific and environmental friendly. Although biological controls are not feasible on a large scale, they are often very effective in localized areas. Therefore, efficacy and potential use of water dispersible granular (WDG) formulations of bacterial larvicide, Vectobac- WGr (Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis [Bti]) (Valent BioSciences Cooperation in USA) was tested against Culex quinquefasciatus in three selected localities in the district of Gampaha. Pre-treatment, treatment and post-treatment adult C. quinquefasciatus mosquito densities were recorded for 20 consecutive days within the study period between May to December 2008. The study period covered both rainy and dry seasons. The larvicide was applied to three selected treatment sites and three control sites with a backpack sprayer to test the efficacy of Bti treatment. The six Pre-treatment surveillances in the three treatment and three control sites were done once a week in the first month and once in two weeks for the second month. Adult mosquitoes collected were identified in the laboratory to the species level and the numbers were recorded. For each site, 30 households were selected, with a total of 180 households. During the first month, treatment and surveillance cycles were carried out at weekly intervals, and once in two weeks during the next two months. Six posttreatment surveillances were carried out in the same way as the pre-treatment surveillances. According to the results obtained in this study, out of three treatment sites, two sites were shown to have Culex mosquito density reduction of 19% and 4%, while an increase in mosquito density was observed in the third site. Further, the three control sites, showed an average of 17% mosquito density reduction even without the application of Vectobac-WGr treatment. These results suggest that the product Vectobac-WGr is not effective on Culex quinquefasciatus as a larvicide to control filariasis in Sri Lanka.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSri Lanka Association for the Advancement of Scienceen_US
dc.subjectCulexen_US
dc.subjectMosquito Controlen_US
dc.titleEfficacy and potential use of VectoBac WGr for the control of Culex quinquifaciatus mosquitoes in three different localities of Gampaha district, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.typeConference Abstracten_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sllas-2009-104A.pdf458.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.