Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/8354
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFernando, M.A.S.T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGunathilaka, P.A.D.H.N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHapugoda, M.D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, B.G.D.N.K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWijeyerathne, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbeyewickreme, W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-18T03:53:19Zen_US
dc.date.available2015-06-18T03:53:19Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the Annual Research Symposium, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya. 2012; 13: 50.en_US
dc.identifier.urien_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/8354en_US
dc.descriptionPoster Presentation Abstract, Annual Research Symposium, FGS, University of Kelaniya, November, 2012, Kelaniyaen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Investigating the presence of primary and secondary vectors of malaria in the selected areas where no entomological surveillance was carried out for about 30 years due to ethnic conflict. Objective: To study prevalence of malaria vector in Ampara District and to assess the risk of malaria in the area. Method: Surveillance was preformed from January 2011 to June 2012 in 4 selected areas (i.e. Panama, Thirukkovil, Mahaoya and Dehiattakandiya) in Ampara District. From each area 4 localities (total 16 localities) were selected for the sample collection in order to ensure full coverage of the District. Cattle Baited Hut Collection (CBHC) and Cattle Baited Net Collection (CBNC) were performed as sample collecting methods on monthly basis throughout the surveillance period. Results: Mosquito densities for each collected Anopheles species were calculated as density per hut or net for CBHT and CBNT respectively. 14 Anopheles species were recorded from CBHC with high prevalence for An. subpictus (68.58%), An. nigerrimus (14.02%) and An. vagus (6.73%). 16 Anopheles species were recorded from CBNC with high prevelance of An. nigerrimus (50.07%), An. peditaeniatus (16.12%), An. pseudojemesi (9.21%) and An. subpictus (7.68%). An. culicifacies (primary malaria vector in Sri Lanka) recorded with lesser densities but An. subpictus, the secondary vector for malaria in Sri Lanka was predominant thorough out this study. Conclusions: The presence of primary and secondary malaria vectors in the area may cause a malaria epidemic in these areas. Hence, it is essential to study the seasonal prevalence of Anopheles species in order to initiate timely controlling measures in Ampara District.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Kelaniyaen_US
dc.subject.meshMalariaen_US
dc.subject.meshMalaria-epidemiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshAnophelesen_US
dc.subject.meshInsect Vectorsen_US
dc.subject.meshPrevalenceen_US
dc.titlePrevalence of Anopheline species in Ampara district, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.typeConference Abstracten_US
Appears in Collections:ARS - 2012
Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fernando, M.A.S.T.pdf8.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.