Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/8193
Title: Analysis of Fatalities in Road Accidents considering Peliyagoda Police Area in Gampaha District as a Case Study
Authors: Dissanayaka, D.M.P.V.
Kulatunga, D.D.S.
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: University of Kelaniya
Citation: Dissanayaka, D.M.P.V. and Kulatunga, D.D.S., 2012. Analysis of Fatalities in Road Accidents considering Peliyagoda Police Area in Gampaha District as a Case Study, Proceedings of the Annual Research Symposium 2012, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya, pp 45-46.
Abstract: Road accidents have become a leading cause of death and injury as well as property damage worldwide. In Sri Lanka, a steady increase of road accidents has been reported resulting in a rising trend of fatalities too. In 2006, there were 2069 fatalities, while 2263 fatalities were reported in 2010. There are a number of factors that increase the risk of road accidents, including vehicle design, speed of operation, road design, road environment, driver’s skill and driver’s behaviour. The objective of this study is to find the factors that mostly contribute to fatal road accidents caused by motor vehicle drivers, using Logistic Regression Analysis. This study investigates the factors affecting fatalities in road accidents in the Peliyagoda Police Area in Gampaha district, using Logistic Regression Analysis. Accident data [519 accidents] recorded at the Peliyagoda Police Station in 2009 were considered. A total number of 506 road accidents where the motor vehicles were at fault were included in the analysis. Based on the data obtained from the police records, several predictor variables were employed in three independent Logistic Regression models in this study. A multinomial logistic model was used in one of them to deal with the multiple nature of dependent variables such as fatal, grievous, non grievous compared to damage only accidents. A binary logistic regression model was also developed to evaluate the odds of fatal accidents compared to non fatal accidents. The odds of an accident being fatal due to the collisions with pedestrians were high in both models with a positive effect. Since there were only 17 fatal accidents (3.4%), both these models were unsuccessful with huge coefficients. Re-categorizing fatal, grievous and non grievous accidents as human damage accidents, and damage only accidents as non human damage accidents, a binary logistic regression model was constructed. Head on crashes, approaching crashes, rear end crashes, crashes in conjunction with turning movements, crashes with pedestrians and passengers were positively related to human damage accidents rather than single crashes. Similarly, in the first two models, crashes with pedestrians and passengers had high impact on increasing the odds of human damage accidents. The odds of an accident being human damage were increased by a factor of 6.888 by having no traffic control rather than having police traffic control. The odds of an accident being human damage by a driver/rider with a valid or probationary driving license were about 25% and 13% respectively, lower than for accidents caused by the drivers/riders without valid license. The odds of an accident being human damage rather than being non-human damage are increased by a factor of 6.742 for motor cycles and bicycles rather than heavy vehicles. For every one-unit increase in the age of the vehicle, we can expect a 1.074 increase in the odds of human damage accidents, holding all other independent variables constant. In the Peliyagoda Police area, analyzing human damage accidents is more effective than analysing fatal accidents. However, a further study is recommended for an area where fatal accidents are more significant.
URI: 
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/8193
Appears in Collections:ARS - 2012

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
D. M. P. V. Dissanayaka.pdf129.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.