Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/4838
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBulus, W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-22T08:40:23Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-22T08:40:23Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationAnnual Research Symposium,Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka; 2014 :39pen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/4838-
dc.description.abstractEducators agree that adequate time is not given to classroom contact hours so as to cover all much desired course materials effectively. As a result, classroom activities are often geared toward ensuring that students understand course concepts with little time left to promote an in � depth critical thinking. One of the most effective ways of utilizing instructional strategies is to actively engage students in activities outside the classroom such as debate. Debate promotes critical thinking which enable students acquire persuasive genres. Additionally, argumentative communication like debate involves studying of reasons, giving people as justification for acts, beliefs, attitudes, etc. Hedges are useful linguistic repertoires that can be utilized in peace and reconciliation process because they mitigate even the harshest utterances. Additionally, the students used hedges in order to reduce the social distance in such a way that every interlocutor felt free.en_US
dc.publisherBook of Abstracts, Annual Research Symposium 2014en_US
dc.titleUsing discourse hedges in school debate: focus on peace and reconciliation-
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.departmentEnglishen_US
Appears in Collections:ARS - 2014

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.