Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/4398
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNissanka, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAmarasinghe, U.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, S.S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-19T04:53:41Z
dc.date.available2014-11-19T04:53:41Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/4398
dc.description.abstractTropical reservoirs are primarily constructed for irrigation, generation of hydroelectricity and water supply schemes. Development of inland fisheries is a secondary use of most reservoirs. In Sri Lanka, most reservoirs are scattered in the rural areas of the country so that investigation of the fisheries of individual reservoirs with a view to developing management plans is prohibitive. The present study was instigated to explore the possibilities of developing suitable yield predictive models, which can be used in developing management strategies for the Sri Lankan reservoirs. The study was carried out in 11 perennial reservoirs of Sri Lanka. Basic limnological parameters (conductivity, dissolved phosphorus, total phosphorus, chlorophyll a [chl a] content and alkalinity) were determined in each of these reservoirs. Daily data on fish catch and fishing effort were collected in each reservoir. Data on catchment areas (CA), reservoir area (RA) and reservoir capacity (RC) were obtained from the irrigation and survey departments. It is evident that chl a is positively influenced by nutrients (dissolved phosphorus and total phosphorus), morphoedaphic indices derived as alkalinity to mean depth (MEIa) and conductivity to mean depth (MEIc) ratios and CA/RC ratios. MEIa and MEIc are also positively influenced by CA/RC ratios. All these morphological and edaphic parameters were found to positively influence fish yield in reservoirs. As fishing intensity (FI) is also a major determinant of fish yields, fish yield was better accounted by multiple regression models in which FI and individual morphological and edaphic parameters were used as independent variables. Of these multiple regression relationships, the best predictive power for fish yield (Y in kg ha?1 yr?1) was found by Y=18.9+6.78 FI+0.0073 CA/RC where FI is expressed as boat-days ha?1 yr?1 and CA and RC are in km2 and km3, respectively. In this relationship, FI and CA/RC account for about 68% of the variation in fish yield.en_US
dc.publisherFisheries Management and Ecologyen_US
dc.subjectcatchment areaen_US
dc.subjectempirical models;fishing intensityen_US
dc.subjectinland fisheriesen_US
dc.subjectlimnologyen_US
dc.subjectreservoir capacityen_US
dc.subjecttropical reservoirsen_US
dc.titleYield predictive models for Sri Lankan reservoir fisheries
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.departmentFisheries Biology and Aquacultureen_US
dc.identifier.departmentZoologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Zoology

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.