Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/27925
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReyal, H.P.-
dc.contributor.authorPerera, M.N.-
dc.contributor.authorGuruge, G.N.D.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-25T04:22:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-25T04:22:05Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health.2024;24(1):1417en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458 (Electronic)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/27925-
dc.descriptionIndexed in MEDLINE.en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Intimate partner violence is the most common form of violence experienced by women. It has detrimental consequences. A range of determinants cause intimate partner violence and to reduce it, effective interventions are required to address the determinants. Health promotion interventions have been recommended as effective to enable people to control over the determinants and to improve health. Hence, a community based participatory health promotion intervention was developed and tested in a selected study setting. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of a health promotion intervention in terms of addressing knowledge, attitudes and practices related to intimate partner violence.METHODS A quasi-experimental study was conducted by recruiting ninety women aged 15 to 49 years separately from two health administrative areas identified as the intervention area and the control area from the Kandy district of Sri Lanka. A pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire was used in both pre- and post-assessments. Selected groups of women from the intervention area were facilitated with a health promotion intervention to improve knowledge, attitudes and practices related to intimate partner violence. To evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention descriptive summaries and bivariate analysis were used.RESULTS The response rate was 90.9% (N = 90) during the pre-assessment and 87.9% (n = 87) and 82.8% (n = 82) from the intervention and control areas, respectively, during the post-assessment. Statistically significant improvement was reported in the total mean score comprising knowledge, attitudes, practices and identification of determinants from 59.6 to 80.8 in the intervention area [Pre-assessment: Mean = 59.6 (standard deviation-SD) = 17.5; Post-assessment: Mean = 80.8, SD = 19.0; p < 0.001) compared to the improvement in the control area from 62.2 to 63.0 (Pre-assessment: Mean = 62.2, SD = 17.3; Post-assessment: Mean = 63.0, SD = 18.9; p = 0.654).CONCLUSIONS The intervention was effective to improve knowledge, attitudes and practices related to intimate partner violence. Hence, the present approach can be used in similar contexts to address the knowledge, attitudes and certain practices related to intimate partner violence.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectAttitudesen_US
dc.subjectCommunity-based participatoryen_US
dc.subjectDeterminantsen_US
dc.subjectIntimate partner violenceen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.subjectQuasi-experimental studyen_US
dc.subjectSri Lankaen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of a community-based participatory health promotion intervention to address knowledge, attitudes and practices related to intimate partner violence: a quasi-experimental studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
12889_2024_Article_18893.pdf888.34 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.