Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/27590
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLokubarana, B. L.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T08:57:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-19T08:57:36Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationLokubarana, B. L. (2023), Tension between National Interests and Global Solidarity: An Analysis of the COVID-19 Response of the UK, India, and Sri Lanka, 6th International Studies Students Research Symposium 2023, Department of International Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/27590-
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 pandemic illustrates the tension between nations prioritizing their domestic interests and the urgent need for global solidarity, cooperation, and shared responsibility. This dynamic, deeply embedded in a theoretical framework that encompasses political, social, and economic paradigms, is evident in the diverse responses of nations such as the UK, a superpower; India, an emerging power; and Sri Lanka, a developing country. The research aims to analyze and compare the COVID-19 responses of these nations to decode the complex interplay between national priorities, international cooperation, and theoretical constructs. In a globalized world, understanding this delicate balance is essential, especially during a crisis, as it informs future diplomatic, health, and socio-economic policies and builds resilience in the international system. Qualitative research methods were employed, analyzing literature, governmental communications, policy documents, and international treaties/agreements, illuminating patterns of national and international actions and interests during the pandemic‟s evolution. The UK's vaccine rollout initially prioritized national needs but later contributed significantly to COVAX, marking a shift from a national to a global focus, a transition elucidated by underlying theoretical constructs. India used vaccine diplomacy as a soft power tool but retracted due to domestic urgencies. Sri Lanka leaned heavily on international goodwill, a decision influenced by theoretical considerations of national capacity and international benevolence. In conclusion, the spectrum of pandemic responses, from initial nationalistic tendencies to collaborative efforts, is more comprehensible when viewed through a theoretical lens. The early emphasis on international collaboration and theoretical groundwork can expedite response times and mitigate nationalistic tendencies, fostering a robust global recovery during future crises.en_US
dc.publisherDepartment of International Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19 Response, Global Solidarity, National Interests, Shared Responsibility, Tensionen_US
dc.titleTension between National Interests and Global Solidarity: An Analysis of the COVID-19 Response of the UK, India, and Sri Lankaen_US
Appears in Collections:ISSRS 2023

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ISSRS 2023 44.pdf123.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.