Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/26807
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKodikara, K.
dc.contributor.authorSeneviratne, T.
dc.contributor.authorPremaratna, R.
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-30T05:07:09Z
dc.date.available2023-10-30T05:07:09Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in Health Sciences Education : Theory and Practice..2023 (Online ahead of print, 2023 Oct 25)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1382-4996 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn1573-1677 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/26807
dc.descriptionIndexed in MEDLINE.en_US
dc.description.abstractSimulation is accepted as an effective method of learning procedural skills. However, the translational outcomes of skills acquired through simulation still warrants investigation. We designed this study to assess if skills laboratory training in addition to bedside learning (intervention group [IG]) would provide better learning results than bedside learning alone (control group [CG]) in the context of venipuncture training. This prospective, cluster-randomized, single-blind study took place at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. Seventeen clusters of second-year medical students were randomly assigned to either IG or CG. The IG trained on venipuncture in the skills laboratory, receiving instruction after modified Payton’s Four Step Method. Following the training, students of both IG and CG underwent bedside learning for one month. Afterward, students of both groups performed venipuncture on actual patients in a clinical setting. An independent, blinded assessor scored students’ performance using the Integrated Procedural Protocol Instrument (IPPI) and a checklist. Patients assessed students’ performance with the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). Eight and nine clusters were randomized to the intervention and control groups, respectively. IG completed significantly more single steps of the procedure correctly (IG: 19.36 ± 3.87 for checklist items; CG: 15.57 ± 4.95; p < 0.001). IG also scored significantly better on IPPI ratings (median: IG: 27 (12) vs. CG: 21 (8); p < 0.001). Rated by patients, students’ communication skills did not significantly differ between the two groups. Simulation-based venipuncture training enabled students to perform the procedure on actual patients with a higher technical accuracy than students who learned venipuncture at the bedside. Students were able to transfer the skills acquired through venipuncture training at the skill laboratory to the bedside.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishersen_US
dc.subjectMedical studenten_US
dc.subjectProcedural trainingen_US
dc.subjectRandomized control trial
dc.subjectSimulation-based training
dc.subjectTransfer of learning.
dc.titleProcedural simulation in venipuncture for medical undergraduates and its transfer to the bedside: a cluster randomized studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.