Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/26393
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArachchi, R.H.-
dc.contributor.authorAtapattu-Bakmeewewa, D.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T05:01:24Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-20T05:01:24Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationYoung Researchers’ Symposium Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya.2023;19en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/26393-
dc.descriptionOral Presentation Session 2(OP 13) - Young Researchers’ Symposium 2023,12 May 2023, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems play a key role in the assistance of people with communication impairments, acquired or congenital. It maximizes the individual’s functional levels by providing an effective communication for their daily needs. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify the types of AAC systems used by adults with acquired communication impairments and describe the adult AAC experience, particularly the facilitators and barriers faced when using an aided AAC system in the local context. METHOD: A qualitative study was conducted to identify the facilitators and barriers of using aided AAC systems. 8 adult participants with complex communication needs who use aided AAC, and their communication partners were recruited to the study. Semi structured individual interviews were conducted as face to face and online. All the interviews were video recorded and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Writing, communication board, typing, and Avaz app were the aided AAC methods used by participants in this study. The overall experience of AAC use was positive for both adults and their caregivers. The study identified several barriers and facilitators that had an impact on effective AAC use, some specific to the adult population. In most cases the AAC user and their family was well informed of the recommended AAC system by the clinician. Caregivers suggested changes to high tech devices, which they envisioned would lead to higher user satisfaction. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the importance of understanding the advantages and limitations of the many available aided AAC systems, which then allows a more conscious recommendation based on the patient’s need.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectneurological communicationen_US
dc.titleExperiences of adults with neurological communication disorders using aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication systems in a lower-middle income countryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:YRS2023

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
YRS2023_abstractbook-20.pdf175.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.