Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/25153
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPerera, B.P.R.
dc.contributor.authorCaldera, A.
dc.contributor.authorGodamunne, P.
dc.contributor.authorStewart-Brown, S.
dc.contributor.authorWickremasinghe, A.R.
dc.contributor.authorJayasuriya, R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T06:18:12Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T06:18:12Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBMC Psychiatry.2022;22(1):569.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-244X
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/25153
dc.descriptionindexed in MEDLINE.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Well-being is an important aspect of people's lives and can be considered as an index of social progress. The Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being scale (WEMWBS) was developed to capture subjective mental well-being. It is a widely tested measure of mental well-being at the population level and has 14 items and a short-form with 7 items. This study was carried out to culturally validate and adapt the WEMWBS among a Sinhala speaking population in Sri Lanka. Methods: A forward and backward translation of the scale into Sinhala was done followed by a cognitive interview. The translated and culturally adapted scale and other mental health scales were administered to a sample of 294 persons between the ages of 17-73 using a paper-based version (n = 210) and an online survey (n = 84). Internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability were tested. Construct validity, and convergent and discriminant validity were assessed using the total sample. Results: The translated questionnaire had good face and content validity. Internal consistency reliability was 0.91 and 0.84 for the 14-item and 7-item scales, respectively. Test-retest reliability over two weeks was satisfactory (Spearman r = 0.72 p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a one factor model. Convergent validity was assessed using WHO-5 well-being index (Spearman r = 0.67, p < 0.001), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Spearman r = (-0.45), p < 0.001) and Kessler psychological distress scale (K10) (Spearman r = (-0.55), p < 0.001). Conclusions: The translated and culturally adapted Sinhala version of the WEMWBS has acceptable psychometric properties to assess mental well-being at the population level among the Sinhala speaking population in Sri Lanka.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central, Londonen_US
dc.subjectMental well-beingen_US
dc.subjectSri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectValidationen_US
dc.subjectWEMWBS Sinhala version.en_US
dc.titleMeasuring mental well-being in Sri Lanka: validation of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in a Sinhala speaking communityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
12888_2022_Article_4211.pdf1.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.