Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/24579
Title: Obtaining Patient Torso Geometry for the Design of Scoliosis Braces. A Study of the Accuracy and Repeatability of Handheld 3D Scanners
Authors: Sanz-Pena, I.
Arachchi, S.
Curtis-Woodcock, N.
Silva, P.
McGregor, A. H.
Newell, N.
Keywords: 3D scanner, scan accuracy, torso geometry, scoliosis brace, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Prosthetics and orthotics international
Citation: Sanz-Pena, I., Arachchi, S., Curtis-Woodcock, N., Silva, P., McGregor, A. H., & Newell, N. (2022). Obtaining Patient Torso Geometry for the Design of Scoliosis Braces. A Study of the Accuracy and Repeatability of Handheld 3D Scanners. Prosthetics and orthotics international, 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000118. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000118
Abstract: Objective: Obtaining patient geometry is crucial in scoliosis brace design for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Advances in 3D scanning technologies provide the opportunity to obtain patient geometries quickly with fewer resources during the design process compared with the plaster-cast method. This study assesses the accuracy and repeatability of such technologies for this application. Methods: The accuracy and repeatability of three different handheld scanners and phone-photogrammetry was assessed using different mesh generation software. Twenty-four scans of a single subject's torso were analyzed for accuracy and repeatability based on anatomical landmark distances and surface deviation maps. Results: Mark II and Structure ST01 scanners showed maximum mean surface deviations of 1.74 ± 3.63 mm and 1.64 ± 3.06 mm, respectively. Deviations were lower for the Peel 1 scanner (maximum of -0.35 ± 2.8 mm) but higher with the use of phone-photogrammetry (maximum of -5.1 ± 4.8 mm). The mean absolute errors of anatomical landmark distance measurements from torso meshes obtained with the Peel 1, Mark II, and ST01 scanners were all within 9.3 mm (3.6%), whereas phone-photogrammetry errors were as high as 18 mm (7%). Conclusions: Low-cost Mark II and ST01 scanners are recommended for obtaining torso geometries because of their accuracy and repeatability. Subject's breathing/movement affects the resultant geometry around the abdominal and anterolateral regions.
URI: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/24579
Appears in Collections:Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1Obtaining_Patient_Torso_Geometry_for_the_Design_of.15.pdf105.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.