Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/24350
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGodahewa, S.
dc.contributor.authorGunasekare, K.
dc.contributor.authorGajasinghe, S.
dc.contributor.authorKumarage, S.
dc.contributor.authorChandrasinghe, P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-15T14:23:41Z
dc.date.available2022-01-15T14:23:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationTechniques in Coloproctology 2021 25(5):619en_US
dc.identifier.issn1123-6337 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn1128-045X (Electronic)
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/24350
dc.descriptionPresentation Abstracts, 14th European Colorectal Congress (ECCS) November 29-December 2, 2020, St.Gallen, Switzerlanden_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND/AIM: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the 4th commonest cancer in Sri Lanka. It is increasingly approached with a curative intent due to the advancements in the surgical and medical management. This has resulted in a large cohort of cancer survivors that needs to be managed. Quality of life (QOL) and patient reported outcomes in CRC survivors assist in identifying and managing unique issues in this population. This study aims to describe objectively measured quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer in a South Asian population. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for CRC and are currently disease free were included. QOL was assessed using the translated and validated SF36 questionnaire (Sinhala) along with patient complaints. SF36 components were aggregated into physical component summery (PCS) and mental component summery (MCS). Patient reported symptoms were categorized in to organ function, life style, and psycho-sexual. RESULTS: A Total of 100 patients completed the survey (median age—61 years; range 25–86, female—56%). Of the total 65% were rectal cancers while 35% were colon cancers. QOL assessment reported a PCS of 0.64 and a MCS of 0.67 (Max- 1.0). There was no difference in QOL between rectal and colon cancers (PCS: rectal—0.64 vs colon—0.63, P = 0.9; MCS: rectal— 0.65 vs colon—0.66) or based on follow-up period (\5 years vs[ 5 years; P = 0.3 and 0.9). Organ function related problems were reported by 69% and increased frequency was the main complaint (27%). CONCLUSION: The QOL of a Sri Lankan cohort of CRC survivors is described. QOL did not differ between rectal and colon cancers. Neither PCS nor MCS had significantly improved over time following surgery.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectColorectal Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectColorectal Neoplasms-Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectCohort Studiesen_US
dc.titleQuality of life following curative surgery for colorectal cancer in a Sri Lankan cohort; North Colombo experienceen_US
dc.typeConference Abstracten_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.