Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/23848
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRivera, L.
dc.contributor.authorBiswal, S.
dc.contributor.authorSáez-Llorens, X.
dc.contributor.authorReynales, H.
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Medina, E.
dc.contributor.authorBorja-Tabora, C.
dc.contributor.authorBravo, L.
dc.contributor.authorSirivichayakul, C.
dc.contributor.authorKosalaraksa, P.
dc.contributor.authorVargas, L.M.
dc.contributor.authorYu, D.
dc.contributor.authorWatanaveeradej, V.
dc.contributor.authorEspinoza, F.
dc.contributor.authorDietze, R.
dc.contributor.authorFernando, L.
dc.contributor.authorWickramasinghe, P.
dc.contributor.authorDuarte Moreira, E. J.
dc.contributor.authorFernando, A. D.
dc.contributor.authorGunasekera, D.
dc.contributor.authorLuz, K.
dc.contributor.authorVenâncio da Cunha, R.
dc.contributor.authorRauscher, M.
dc.contributor.authorZent, O.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, M.
dc.contributor.authorHoffman, E.
dc.contributor.authorLeFevre, I.
dc.contributor.authorTricou, V.
dc.contributor.authorWallace, D.
dc.contributor.authorAlera, M.T.
dc.contributor.authorBorkowski, A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-05T07:21:21Z
dc.date.available2021-11-05T07:21:21Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationClinical Infectious Diseases. 2022; 24; 75(1):107-117.[Epub 2021 Oct 4]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1058-4838 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn1537-6591 (Electronic)en
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/23848
dc.descriptionIndexed for MEDLINE.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Takeda's live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) is under evaluation in a long-term clinical trial across eight dengue-endemic countries. Previously, we have reported its efficacy and safety in both seronegative and seropositive participants and that its performance varies by serotype, with some decline in efficacy from first to second year post-vaccination. This exploratory analysis provides an update with cumulative and third year data. Methods: Healthy 4-16 year-olds (n=20,099) were randomized 2:1 to receive TAK-003 or placebo (0, 3 month schedule). The protocol included baseline serostatus testing of all participants and detection of all symptomatic dengue throughout the trial with a serotype specific RT-PCR. Results: Cumulative efficacy after three years was 62.0% (95% confidence interval: 56.6%, 66.7%) against virologically-confirmed dengue (VCD) and 83.6% (76.8%, 88.4%) against hospitalized VCD. Efficacy was 54.3% (41.9%, 64.1%) against VCD and 77.1% (58.6%, 87.3%) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seronegatives, and 65.0% (58.9%, 70.1%) against VCD and 86.0% (78.4%, 91.0%) against hospitalized VCD in seropositives. Efficacy against VCD during the third year declined to 44.7% (32.5%, 54.7%), while efficacy against hospitalized VCD was sustained at 70.8% (49.6%, 83.0%). Rates of serious adverse events were 2.9% in TAK-003 group and 3.5% in placebo group during the ongoing long-term follow-up (i.e. second half of the three years following vaccination), but none were related. No important safety risks were identified. Conclusions: TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue over three years. Efficacy declined over time but remained robust against hospitalized dengue. A booster dose evaluation is planned.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.subjectDengue Vaccineen_US
dc.titleThree years efficacy and safety of Takeda's dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ciab864.pdf7.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.