Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2299
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWijegunawardana, A.D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGunawardene, N.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHapuarachchi, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorManamperi, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGunawardena, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbeyewickreme, W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLatif, B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T09:41:54Z
dc.date.available2014-10-29T09:41:54Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine; 3(5): 381-87en_US
dc.identifier.issn1513-7368 (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2299
dc.descriptionIndexed in MEDLINE, In SCOPUSen
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To compare Wuchereria bancrofti (W. bancrofti) infection rates of Culex quinquefasciatus, using dissection and PCR-ELISA in two consecutive time periods (from 2007 to 2008 and from 2008 to 2009). METHODS: Mosquitoes were collected in 30 sentinel and 15 non-sentinel sites in 15 Medical Officer of Health areas of Gampaha Districtknown for the presence of W. bancrofti transmission in two consecutive time period of 2007 to 2008 and 2008 to 2009. Captured mosquitoes were dissected to determine the W. bancrofti larvae (L1, L2, L3). PCR was carried out using DNA extracted from mosquito pools (15 body parts/pool) utilizing the primers specific for Wb-SspI repeat. PCR products were analyzed by hybridization ELISA using fluorescein-labeled wild type specific probes. The prevalence of infected/infective mosquitoes in PCR pools (3 pools/site) was estimated using the PoolScreen™ algorithm and a novel probability-based method. RESULTS: Of 45 batches of mosquitoes dissected, W. bancrofti infected mosquitoes were found in 19 and 13 batches, with an infection rate of 13.29% and 3.10% with mean larval density of 8.7 and 1.0 larvae per mosquito for two study periods in the Gampaha District. Total of 405 pools of head, thorax and abdomen were processed by PCR-ELISA for each year. Of these, 51 and 31 pools were positive for W. bancrofti in the two study periods respectively. The association of dissection based prevalence rates with PCR based rates as determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient were 0.176 and 0.890 respectively for the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: Data indicate that PCR-ELISA is more sensitive than the traditional dissection techniques for monitoring transmission intensity
dc.publisherAsian Pacific Organization for Cancer Preventionen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of PCR-ELISA as a tool for monitoring transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti in District of Gampaha, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.departmentMolecular Medicine Uniten_US
dc.identifier.departmentParasitologyen_US
dc.creator.corporateauthorAsian Pacific Organization for Cancer Preventionen_US
dc.creator.corporateauthorInternational Association of Cancer Registriesen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.