Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/21833
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNiriella, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorEdiriweera, D.S.
dc.contributor.authorKasturiratne, A.
dc.contributor.authorGunasekara, D.
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, S.T.
dc.contributor.authorDassanayake, A.S.
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorKato, N.
dc.contributor.authorPathmeswaran, A.
dc.contributor.authorWickremasinghe, A.R.
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, H.J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-01T03:56:52Z
dc.date.available2021-02-01T03:56:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Radiology. 2021; 136:109516. [Online ahead of print]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0720-048X (Print)
dc.identifier.issn1872-7727 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.issn0720-048X (Linking)
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/21833
dc.descriptionIndexed in MEDLINEen_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Despite its widespread use there is no consensus on ultrasound criteria to diagnose fatty liver. METHOD: In an ongoing, cohort-study, participants were initially screened in 2007 and reassessed in 2014 by interview, anthropometric measurements, liver ultrasonography, and blood tests. We evaluated utility of increased hepatic echogenicity alone (intermediate) compared to using additional criteria which included signal attenuation and/or vascular blunting along with increase of hepatic echogenicity (moderate-severe), to diagnose fatty liver in NAFLD. We made a comparison of the two radiologically defined groups, in order to choose a classification method for NAFLD, which may better predict baseline adverse metabolic traits (MT), and adverse metabolic and cardiovascular events (CVE) after 7-year of follow-up. RESULTS: Of 2985 recruited in 2007, 940 (31.5 %) had moderate-severe NAFLD, 595 (19.9 %) intermediate NAFLD, and 957 (32.1 %) were controls (no fatty liver). 2148 (71.9 %) attended follow-up in 2014; they included 708 who had moderate-severe NAFLD, 446 intermediate NAFLD and 674 controls, at baseline (in 2007). At baseline, adverse anthropometric indices and MTs were significantly higher in both moderate-severe NAFLD and intermediate NAFLD compared to controls, except for low HDL. They were commoner in moderate-severe NAFLD than in intermediate NAFLD. After seven years, the odds of developing new-onset metabolic traits and CVEs were significantly higher compared to controls only in moderate-severe NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS: Only moderate-severe NAFLD predicted risk of incident adverse MTs and CVEs. However, both moderate-severe and intermediate NAFLD were associated with higher prevalence of adverse anthropometric and metabolic traits, thereby identifying individuals who need medical intervention even among those with milder degrees of fatty liver. We therefore recommend using increased hepatic echogenicity, and not only the more stringent criteria (which include signal attenuation and/or vascular blunting), for the diagnosis of fatty liver in individuals with NAFLD. KEYWORDS: Cardiovascular events; Fatty liver; NAFLD; Outcomes; Ultrasonography; Ultrasound criteria.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Ireland Ltden_US
dc.subjectultrasound gradingen_US
dc.titleThe clinical utility of accurate NAFLD ultrasound grading: Results from a community-based, prospective cohort studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.