Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/21631
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPriyantha, A.
dc.contributor.authorTillakaratne, S.
dc.contributor.authorGamage, P.K.W.
dc.contributor.authorNagalingam, S.
dc.contributor.authorDombagahapathirage, E.P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-25T04:31:41Z
dc.date.available2020-11-25T04:31:41Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSri Lanka Journal of Surgery.2020; 38(2): 19–24.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2279-2201
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/21631
dc.descriptionNot indexed in MEDLINEen_US
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Making a positive diagnosis of functional gastrointestinal disorders based on the patterns of symptoms allows the clinician to manage the patients without further investigations (treat and test strategy) to exclude an organic disorder (test and treat strategy). The objectives were to diagnose and classify the functional gastrointestinal disorders according to Rome III criteria among the patients attending to a Gastrointestinal surgery clinic and to assess the effectiveness of the treat and test strategy. METHODOLOGY: In a prospective study data were collected from consecutive patients who were likely to have functional gastrointestinal disorders. Diagnosis and classification were performed by an interviewer administered Rome III questionnaire. They were then treated according to their symptoms and considered for further investigations or only follow up depending on the response. RESULTS: There were 103 patients with “likely FGID” among 665 clinic patients (15.4%) over six-month period. Eighty-two patients fulfilled the Rome III criteria (79.6 %). Forty-nine patients had single FGID (59.7%) whereas 33(40.2%) patients had overlap symptoms. Eighty-one patients (78.6 %) have been followed up for a mean duration of 12.3 months. Sixty-five patients (80.2 %) underwent investigations whereas sixteen patients had only followed up (19.8 %). Three patients (3.7 %) were diagnosed with organic illness during the follow up. CONCLUSION: Functional gastrointestinal disorders are common among our patients. Making a positive diagnosis initially can avoid unnecessary investigations. Close follow up is necessary to avoid false negatives if empirical treatment (algorithmic approach) is used in the initial management. KEYWORDS: Follow up, functional gastrointestinal disorders, Rome III, symptomsen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Surgeons of Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectGastrointestinal Diseaseen_US
dc.titleBurden of functional gastrointestinal disorders in a surgical clinic in Sri Lankaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Burden of functional gastrointestinal.pdf502.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.