Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2068
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSingh, N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRashid, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHerath, R.P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T09:32:34Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-29T09:32:34Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 31(1): pp.62-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn0144-3615 (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1364-6893 (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/2068-
dc.description.abstractChronic pelvic pain is a common condition and the RCOG guideline provides an evidence-based framework for the initial assessment. This study investigated the adequacy and relevance of the initial assessment in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic procedure for pelvic pain. History-taking was found to be deficient and was unable to identify factors which may be related to the cause or perception of the pain. Only a small percentage benefitted from a therapeutic trial of hormonal and non-hormonal agents and referral to other specialities. Ultrasound and bimanual examination were both found to be of little value. Laparoscopy assisted in diagnosis in 45% of patients. A structured initial assessment and targeted selection of patients for laparoscopy would reduce the number of patients with normal findings and thus, it would reduce the number of women who suffer pain and isolation after a negative laparoscopy.-
dc.publisherInforma Healthcareen_US
dc.titleHow can we reduce negative laparoscopies for pelvic pain?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.creator.corporateauthorUniversity of London Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.