Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/19214
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Talagala, I. A. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Samarakoon, Y. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Senanayake, S. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Abeysena, C. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-01T08:03:02Z | en |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-01T08:03:02Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2019; 25(4):630-636. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1356-1294 (Print) | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-2753 (Electronic) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/19214 | en_US |
dc.description | Indexed in MEDLINE | |
dc.description.abstract | RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) play a major role in patient care in Sri Lanka. This study evaluates the methodological quality of the Sri Lankan CPGs developed in 2007. METHODS: A total of 94 CPGs developed by several professional colleges in Sri Lanka in the year 2007 were evaluated by 2 independent reviewers using AGREE II instrument for their methodological quality. Item score being ≤3 points was defined as "poor quality". Each domain score was calculated according to AGREE II. A guideline was labelled as "strongly recommended" if 4 or more domains scored above 60%, "recommended for use with certain modification" if only 3 domain scores were above 60% or if 4 or more domain scores were between 30% and 60%, and "not recommended" if 4 or more domains scored less than 30%. RESULTS: Most (22.3%) guidelines were developed by the College of Pathologists. Most of the guidelines (>55%) poorly reported on all the items, except for items 1, 2, and 22 of AGREE II. Median domain scores [range] and the proportion of the guidelines with domain score of <30% were as follows: domain on scope and purpose (33.3% [2.8%-83.3%]; 42.6%), stakeholder involvement (14.9% [0.0%-61.1%]; 81.9%), rigour of development (6.1% [0.0%-49%]; 98.9%), clarity and presentation (30.5% [8.3%-61.1%]; 46.8%), and applicability (8.3% [4.2%-14.6%]; 100%). All CPGs scored 50% for "editorial independence". Reviewers reported the overall quality was poor in 86 (91.5%). Based on the definitions used in the study, of 94 CPGs, 8 (8.5%) could be recommended to be used with modifications, while 86 (91.5%) could not be recommended for clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: The methodological quality of the CPGs was poor irrespective of the source of development. Major efforts are essential to update the CPGs according to the principles of evidence based medicine. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell | en_US |
dc.subject | Practice Guidelines as Topic | en_US |
dc.subject | Practice Guidelines as Topic-standards | en |
dc.subject | Quality Assurance, Health Care | en |
dc.subject | Sri Lanka | en |
dc.title | Sri Lankan clinical practice guidelines: A methodological quality assessment utilizing the AGREE II instrument. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1885-J Eval Clin Pract_2018.pdf | 219 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.