Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/18965
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUdayanga, L.en
dc.contributor.authorGunathilaka, N.en
dc.contributor.authorIqbal, M.C.M.en
dc.contributor.authorNajim, M.M.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPahalagedara, K.en
dc.contributor.authorAbeyewickreme, W.en
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-08T10:12:22Zen
dc.date.available2018-08-08T10:12:22Zen_US
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.citationParasites & Vectors.2018;11(1):368en_US
dc.identifier.issn1756-3305 (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1756-3305 (Linking)en
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/18965en_US
dc.descriptionIndexed In MEDLINEen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Larval indices such as Premise Index (PI), Breteau Index (BI) and Container Index (CI) are widely used to interpret the density of dengue vectors in surveillance programmes. These indices may be useful for forecasting disease outbreaks in an area. However, use of the values of these indices as alarm signals is rarely considered in control programmes. Therefore, the current study aims to propose threshold values for vector indices based on an empirical modeling approach for the Kandy District of Sri Lanka. METHODS: Monthly vector indices, viz PI, BI and CI, for Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, of four selected dengue high risk Medical Officer of Health (MOH) areas in the Kandy District from January 2010 to August 2017, were used in the study. Gumbel frequency analysis was used to calculate the exceedance probability of quantitative values for each individual larval index within the relevant MOH area, individually and to set up the threshold values for the entomological management of dengue vectors. RESULTS: Among the study MOH areas, Akurana indicated a relatively high density of both Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus, while Gangawata Korale MOH area had the lowest. Based on Ae. aegypti, threshold values were defined for Kandy as low risk (BIagp > 1.77), risk (BIagp > 3.23), moderate risk (BIagp > 4.47) and high risk (BIagp > 6.23). In addition, PI > 6.75 was defined as low risk, while PI > 9.43 and PI>12.82 were defined as moderate and high risk, respectively as an average. CONCLUSIONS: Threshold values recommended for Ae. aegypti (primary vector for dengue) along with cut-off values for PI (for Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus), could be suggested as indicators for decision making in vector control efforts. This may also facilitate the rational use of financial allocations, technical and human resources for vector control approaches in Sri Lanka in a fruitful manner.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectDengueen_US
dc.subjectDengue-epidemiologyen
dc.subjectDengue-prevention & control
dc.subjectDengue-transmission
dc.subjectDisease Management
dc.subjectMosquito Control-methods
dc.subjectMosquito Vectors
dc.subjectAedes
dc.subjectEmpirical Research
dc.subjectSri Lanka-epidemiologyen
dc.titleEmpirical optimization of risk thresholds for dengue: an approach towards entomological management of Aedes mosquitoes based on larval indices in the Kandy District of Sri Lankaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
13071_2018_Article_2961.pdf1.58 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.