Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/17941
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSiriwardana, R.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLiyanage, C.A.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGunetilleke, B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNiriella, M.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorde Silva, H.J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDassanayake, A.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJayatunga, S.P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T07:25:50Zen_US
dc.date.available2017-11-01T07:25:50Zen_US
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.citationGastrointestinal Tumors.2017;4(1-2):20-27en_US
dc.identifier.issn2296-3774 (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2296-3766 (Electronic)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2296-3774 (Linking)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/17941en_US
dc.descriptionIndexed in PUBMED, Not in MEDLINEen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Data on diffuse-type hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are rare. HCC in Sri Lanka is rising, and the majority is related to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. This study was planned to compare nodular- and diffuse-type HCC in this cohort. METHODS: CT scans of 227 patients with HCC negative for infective hepatitis were analyzed and grouped as nodular and diffuse from July 2011 to July 2014. Diffuse-type cancer was defined as a tumor without convex/distinct margin, diffusely infiltrating the hepatic parenchyma. There were 45 (20%) cases. The baseline liver functions, etiology, treatment, and the outcome were compared with nodular-type cancers. Stage III diffuse cancers were matched with 2 stage III nodular cancers looking at the T stage and background liver. RESULTS: There was no difference in the age (63 vs. 62 years, p = 0.937) and gender. Diffuse cancers had a low BMI (24 vs. 22, p = 0.009), a higher alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level (p < 0.001), a higher incidence of major vascular invasion (14 vs. 80%, p < 0.001), and a history of significant alcohol consumption (39 vs. 67%, p = 0.001). The baseline liver functions were similar in diffuse and nodular cancers. A large proportion (27 vs.77%, p < 0.001) of diffuse cancers were not candidates for active treatment. Overall survival was poor in the diffuse type(4.7 vs. 25 months, p < 0.001). Diffuse-type stage III cancers had a poor survival compared to matched nodular cancers (2.5 vs. 15.8 months, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: HCC without a background of infective hepatitis were common in our cohort. These tumors are associated with high AFP levels, major vascular invasion, and a poor prognosis.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKarger Medical and Scientific Publishersen_US
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Hepatocellularen_US
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Hepatocellular-diagnosisen_US
dc.subject.meshCarcinoma, Hepatocellular-pathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm Stagingen_US
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm Invasivenessen_US
dc.subject.meshPrognosisen_US
dc.titleDiffuse-Type Hepatoma: A grave prognostic markeren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.