Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/17029
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWalker, S.en
dc.contributor.authorGibbins, J.en
dc.contributor.authorPaes, P.en
dc.contributor.authorBarclay, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAdams, A.en
dc.contributor.authorChandratilake, M.en
dc.contributor.authorGishen, F.en
dc.contributor.authorLodge, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWee, B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-12T07:23:48Zen
dc.date.available2017-05-12T07:23:48Zen
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 2018; 8(3):299-306en_US
dc.identifier.issn2045-435X (Print)
dc.identifier.issn2045-4368 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.issn2045-435X (Linking)
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.kln.ac.lk/handle/123456789/17029
dc.descriptionIndexed In MEDLINEen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Effective training at medical school is essential to prepare new doctors to safely manage patients with palliative care (PC) and end of life care (EOLC) needs. The contribution of undergraduate PC course organisers is central but their collective views regarding role are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To survey attitudes of PC course organisers regarding their course, organisation, the adequacy of training provided and level of personal satisfaction. METHODS: An anonymised, multifactorial, web-based questionnaire was devised, tested, modified and then sent to lead PC course organisers at all UK medical schools. RESULTS: Data were obtained from all 30 UK medical schools. Organisers agreed/strongly agreed (=agreed) that their PC course was highly rated by students (26, 87%). 25 (83%) agreed their course 'enabled misconceptions and fears about PC, death, dying and bereavement to be addressed', 'delivered quality PC training' (23, 77%), 'fulfilled General Medical Council requirements' (19, 63%), 'prepared students well to care for patients with PC/EOLC needs' (18, 60%) and 'enabled students to visit a hospice and see the role of doctors in caring for the dying' (17, 57%). Concerns were limited capacity to accommodate students (agreed 20, 66%) and variability in teaching according to location (15, 50%). Most agreed their institution recognised PC training as important (22, 73%), they felt supported by colleagues (21, 70%) and experienced cooperation between stakeholders (20, 67%). All agreed that PC training was essential for undergraduates, while 29 (97%) supported inclusion of a hospice visit in the curriculum. 27 agreed that their role was satisfying (90%), 3 disagreed (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately two-thirds of organisers were generally positive about their PC course, institution and role. A minority expressed concerns; these may reflect suboptimal PC training at their medical school and poor preparation of new doctors.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.subjectpalliative careen_US
dc.titlePreparing future doctors for palliative care: views of course organisersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.