Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.identifier.citation||Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology. 2003; 97(2): pp.179-85||en_US|
|dc.description||Indexed in MEDLINE||-|
|dc.description.abstract||The ICT card test to detect circulating filarial antigen and an ELISA that detects filaria-specific urinary IgG(4) were each used to screen 473 subjects from a community in Sri Lanka where Wuchereria bancrofti is endemic. When the ICT test was used as the gold standard, the ELISA was found to have a sensitivity of 91.2%. However, far more of the subjects were found ELISA-positive than ICT-positive (76.5% v. 31.1%). The youngest children studied (aged 1-10 years) were similar to the adult subjects in terms of the prevalence of antigenaemia (33.8%) and the prevalence (72.1%) and concentration of filaria-specific IgG(4) in their urine. Therefore, especially as urine samples are easier, less painful and safer to collect than blood samples, the ELISA may be particularly useful to screen very young and school-age children, to estimate current levels of transmission in a particular area.||-|
|dc.subject||Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay-methods||-|
|dc.title||Human infection with Wuchereria bancrofti in Matara, Sri Lanka: the use, in parallel, of an ELISA to detect filaria-specific IgG4 in urine and of ICT card tests to detect filarial antigen in whole blood||en_US|
|dc.creator.corporateauthor||Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine||en_US|
|Appears in Collections:||Journal/Magazine Articles|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.